D. K. Jha, eep Kumar Gupta, Nirajan Thapa Kshetry, P. Raju, Ay, B. R. Pokharel
{"title":"A Pioneer Case Study on Identification of Infant Rhinoceros Horn","authors":"D. K. Jha, eep Kumar Gupta, Nirajan Thapa Kshetry, P. Raju, Ay, B. R. Pokharel","doi":"10.4172/2157-7145.1000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the authenticity of infant Rhino horn sample from morphometric, microscopic, genetic \n and phylogenetic studies. \nMethods: A suspected rhino horn sample (11 cm × 13 cm) was sent to the laboratory for identification. Relevant \n morphometric data of sample were taken. Similarly, established methods for microscopic examination of rhino horn \n were adopted. Using standard universal primer, a part of Cytochrome b (Cyt b) and 12S rRNA was amplified from \n sample, sequenced and aligned using BLAST of the GenBank (NCBI) and in-house reference database available at Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India for decisive confirmation of species. \nResults: Morphometric analysis showed the sample was oval, dome shaped with a bony part which was \n supported by upper skin. Presence of filamentous units is the microscopic identifying feature of genuine rhino horn. \n However, microscopic examination showed very unclear filamentous units because of the immature nature of \n sample. Mitochondrial sequence data revealed the source of suspected sample was of a one-horn Rhinoceros \n (Rhinoceros unicornis). Similarly, NJ method for phylogenetic analysis for both Cytb and 12S rRNA identified \n sequence similarity with Rhinoceros unicornis. \nConclusion: Even though the morphometric and microscopic data do not reveal much about the infant rhino \n horn, mtDNA sequencing used in this pioneer study can be applied in the wildlife forensic for identification of such \n parts in future and data used as evidence against the poachers in the court of law.","PeriodicalId":90216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensics research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2157-7145.1000374","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the authenticity of infant Rhino horn sample from morphometric, microscopic, genetic
and phylogenetic studies.
Methods: A suspected rhino horn sample (11 cm × 13 cm) was sent to the laboratory for identification. Relevant
morphometric data of sample were taken. Similarly, established methods for microscopic examination of rhino horn
were adopted. Using standard universal primer, a part of Cytochrome b (Cyt b) and 12S rRNA was amplified from
sample, sequenced and aligned using BLAST of the GenBank (NCBI) and in-house reference database available at Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India for decisive confirmation of species.
Results: Morphometric analysis showed the sample was oval, dome shaped with a bony part which was
supported by upper skin. Presence of filamentous units is the microscopic identifying feature of genuine rhino horn.
However, microscopic examination showed very unclear filamentous units because of the immature nature of
sample. Mitochondrial sequence data revealed the source of suspected sample was of a one-horn Rhinoceros
(Rhinoceros unicornis). Similarly, NJ method for phylogenetic analysis for both Cytb and 12S rRNA identified
sequence similarity with Rhinoceros unicornis.
Conclusion: Even though the morphometric and microscopic data do not reveal much about the infant rhino
horn, mtDNA sequencing used in this pioneer study can be applied in the wildlife forensic for identification of such
parts in future and data used as evidence against the poachers in the court of law.