European colonization and the emergence of novel fire regimes in southeast Australia

M. Adeleye, S. Connor, S. Haberle, A. Herbert, Josephine R. Brown
{"title":"European colonization and the emergence of novel fire regimes in southeast Australia","authors":"M. Adeleye, S. Connor, S. Haberle, A. Herbert, Josephine R. Brown","doi":"10.1177/20530196211044630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid increase in severe wildfires in many parts of the world, especially in temperate systems, requires urgent attention to reduce fires’ catastrophic impacts on human lives, livelihoods, health and economy. Of particular concern is southeast Australia, which harbours one of the most flammable vegetation types on Earth. While previous studies suggest climate and European activities drove changes in southeast Australian fire regimes in the last 200 years, no study has quantitatively tested the relative roles of these drivers. Here, we use a Generalized Linear Modelling to identify the major driver(s) of fire regime change in the southeast Australian mainland during and prior to European colonization. We use multiple charcoal and pollen records across the region and quantitatively compare fire history to records of climate and vegetation change. Results show low levels of biomass burned before colonization, when landscapes where under Indigenous management, even under variable climates. Biomass burned increased markedly due to vegetation/land-use change after colonization and a major decline in regional precipitation about 100 years later. We conclude that Indigenous-maintained open vegetation minimized the amount of biomass burned prior to colonization, while European-suppression of Indigenous land management has amplified biomass accumulation and fuel connectivity in southeast Australian forests since colonization. While climate change remains a major challenge for fire mitigation, implementation of a management approach similar to the pre-colonial period is suggested to ameliorate the risk of future catastrophic fires in the region.","PeriodicalId":74943,"journal":{"name":"The anthropocene review","volume":"9 1","pages":"537 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The anthropocene review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196211044630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The rapid increase in severe wildfires in many parts of the world, especially in temperate systems, requires urgent attention to reduce fires’ catastrophic impacts on human lives, livelihoods, health and economy. Of particular concern is southeast Australia, which harbours one of the most flammable vegetation types on Earth. While previous studies suggest climate and European activities drove changes in southeast Australian fire regimes in the last 200 years, no study has quantitatively tested the relative roles of these drivers. Here, we use a Generalized Linear Modelling to identify the major driver(s) of fire regime change in the southeast Australian mainland during and prior to European colonization. We use multiple charcoal and pollen records across the region and quantitatively compare fire history to records of climate and vegetation change. Results show low levels of biomass burned before colonization, when landscapes where under Indigenous management, even under variable climates. Biomass burned increased markedly due to vegetation/land-use change after colonization and a major decline in regional precipitation about 100 years later. We conclude that Indigenous-maintained open vegetation minimized the amount of biomass burned prior to colonization, while European-suppression of Indigenous land management has amplified biomass accumulation and fuel connectivity in southeast Australian forests since colonization. While climate change remains a major challenge for fire mitigation, implementation of a management approach similar to the pre-colonial period is suggested to ameliorate the risk of future catastrophic fires in the region.
欧洲殖民和澳大利亚东南部新火灾制度的出现
世界许多地区,特别是温带地区,严重野火的迅速增加,迫切需要关注减少火灾对人类生命、生计、健康和经济的灾难性影响。特别令人担忧的是澳大利亚东南部,那里有地球上最易燃的植被类型之一。尽管之前的研究表明,气候和欧洲活动在过去200年中推动了澳大利亚东南部火灾状况的变化 多年来,没有任何研究对这些驱动因素的相对作用进行定量测试。在这里,我们使用广义线性模型来确定欧洲殖民期间和之前澳大利亚东南部大陆火灾制度变化的主要驱动因素。我们使用了该地区的多个木炭和花粉记录,并将火灾历史与气候和植被变化记录进行了定量比较。结果显示,在殖民化之前,当景观处于土著管理之下时,即使在多变的气候下,生物量也会燃烧得很低。由于殖民化后植被/土地利用的变化和区域降水量的大幅下降,燃烧的生物量显著增加约100 几年后。我们得出的结论是,土著人维持的开放植被使殖民前燃烧的生物量降至最低,而欧洲对土著土地管理的镇压加剧了殖民以来澳大利亚东南部森林的生物量积累和燃料连通性。虽然气候变化仍然是缓解火灾的一个主要挑战,但建议实施类似于前殖民时期的管理方法,以降低该地区未来发生灾难性火灾的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信