Comparison between RLS-GA and RLS-PSO for Li-ion battery SOC and SOH estimation: a simulation study

Latief Rozaqi, E. Rijanto, S. Kanarachos
{"title":"Comparison between RLS-GA and RLS-PSO for Li-ion battery SOC and SOH estimation: a simulation study","authors":"Latief Rozaqi, E. Rijanto, S. Kanarachos","doi":"10.14203/j.mev.2017.v8.40-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a new method of concurrent SOC and SOH estimation using a combination of recursive least square (RLS) algorithm and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The RLS algorithm is equipped with multiple fixed forgetting factors (MFFF) which are optimized by PSO. The performance of the hybrid RLS-PSO is compared with the similar RLS which is optimized by single objective genetic algorithms (SOGA) as well as multi-objectives genetic algorithm (MOGA). Open circuit voltage (OCV) is treated as a parameter to be estimated at the same timewith internal resistance. Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) is used as the input data. Simulation results show that the hybrid RLS-PSO algorithm provides little better performance than the hybrid RLS-SOGA algorithm in terms of mean square error (MSE) and a number of iteration. On the other hand, MOGA provides Pareto front containing optimum solutions where a specific solution can be selected to have OCV MSE performance as good as PSO.","PeriodicalId":30530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechatronics Electrical Power and Vehicular Technology","volume":"8 1","pages":"40-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechatronics Electrical Power and Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/j.mev.2017.v8.40-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper proposes a new method of concurrent SOC and SOH estimation using a combination of recursive least square (RLS) algorithm and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The RLS algorithm is equipped with multiple fixed forgetting factors (MFFF) which are optimized by PSO. The performance of the hybrid RLS-PSO is compared with the similar RLS which is optimized by single objective genetic algorithms (SOGA) as well as multi-objectives genetic algorithm (MOGA). Open circuit voltage (OCV) is treated as a parameter to be estimated at the same timewith internal resistance. Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) is used as the input data. Simulation results show that the hybrid RLS-PSO algorithm provides little better performance than the hybrid RLS-SOGA algorithm in terms of mean square error (MSE) and a number of iteration. On the other hand, MOGA provides Pareto front containing optimum solutions where a specific solution can be selected to have OCV MSE performance as good as PSO.
RLS-GA和RLS-PSO在锂离子电池SOC和SOH估计中的比较仿真研究
本文提出了一种将递归最小二乘(RLS)算法与粒子群优化(PSO)相结合的SOC和SOH并行估计新方法。RLS算法配备了多个固定遗忘因子(MFFF),并通过PSO对其进行了优化。将混合RLS-PSO的性能与类似的RLS进行了比较,后者通过单目标遗传算法和多目标遗传算法进行了优化。开路电压(OCV)被视为与内阻同时估计的参数。城市测功机驾驶计划(UDDS)用作输入数据。仿真结果表明,在均方误差(MSE)和迭代次数方面,混合RLS-PSO算法的性能略优于混合RLS-SOGA算法。另一方面,MOGA提供了包含Pareto前沿的最优解,其中可以选择具有与PSO一样好的OCV MSE性能的特定解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信