Effects of oral administration of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 to nursing piglets on preweaning growth performance, fecal consistency, and fecal microbes

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
M. Menegat, J. DeRouchey, J. Woodworth, M. Tokach, R. Goodband, S. Dritz
{"title":"Effects of oral administration of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 to nursing piglets on preweaning growth performance, fecal consistency, and fecal microbes","authors":"M. Menegat, J. DeRouchey, J. Woodworth, M. Tokach, R. Goodband, S. Dritz","doi":"10.54846/jshap/1151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effects of daily oral dose of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 to nursing piglets on fecal consistency, fecal microbes, and preweaning performance in a controlled trial. Materials and methods: A total of 26 litters of nursing piglets were assigned to receive a daily oral dose of placebo (n = 14 litters) or probiotic (n = 12 litters) for 18 days beginning on day 2 after birth until weaning on day 19. The probiotic treatment was B subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin, Calpis Co Ltd). Treatments were applied orally once daily to individual piglets via 1 mL sugar-based gel solution alone (placebo) or with B subtilis C-3102. Growth performance and litter size were measured on days 2, 9, 16, and 19. Fecal scoring and sampling were performed on days 2, 9, and 16 to categorize fecal consistency and conduct microbial analysis by isolation and enumeration method. Results: There was no statistical difference (P > .05) on growth performance, litter size, mortality, and fecal consistency in the preweaning period between placebo- and probiotic-treated litters. The numbers of B subtilis C-3102 (P < .001), total Bacillus species (P < .001), and total aerobes (P = .03) were increased in litters receiving probiotic compared to placebo. The numbers of Lactobacillus species, Enterococcus species, Clostridium perfringens, and Enterobacteriaceae were not influenced by treatment. Implications: A daily oral dose of B subtilis C-3102 probiotic did not influence preweaning growth performance and fecal consistency of nursing piglets and only influenced Bacillus species fecal microbial population.","PeriodicalId":17095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of daily oral dose of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 to nursing piglets on fecal consistency, fecal microbes, and preweaning performance in a controlled trial. Materials and methods: A total of 26 litters of nursing piglets were assigned to receive a daily oral dose of placebo (n = 14 litters) or probiotic (n = 12 litters) for 18 days beginning on day 2 after birth until weaning on day 19. The probiotic treatment was B subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin, Calpis Co Ltd). Treatments were applied orally once daily to individual piglets via 1 mL sugar-based gel solution alone (placebo) or with B subtilis C-3102. Growth performance and litter size were measured on days 2, 9, 16, and 19. Fecal scoring and sampling were performed on days 2, 9, and 16 to categorize fecal consistency and conduct microbial analysis by isolation and enumeration method. Results: There was no statistical difference (P > .05) on growth performance, litter size, mortality, and fecal consistency in the preweaning period between placebo- and probiotic-treated litters. The numbers of B subtilis C-3102 (P < .001), total Bacillus species (P < .001), and total aerobes (P = .03) were increased in litters receiving probiotic compared to placebo. The numbers of Lactobacillus species, Enterococcus species, Clostridium perfringens, and Enterobacteriaceae were not influenced by treatment. Implications: A daily oral dose of B subtilis C-3102 probiotic did not influence preweaning growth performance and fecal consistency of nursing piglets and only influenced Bacillus species fecal microbial population.
哺乳仔猪口服枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102对断奶前生长性能、粪便稠度和粪便微生物的影响
目的:在一项对照试验中,评价每天口服枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102对仔猪粪便稠度、粪便微生物和断奶前性能的影响。材料和方法:共有26窝哺乳仔猪被分配接受安慰剂(n=14窝)或益生菌(n=12窝)的每日口服剂量,持续18天,从出生后第2天开始,直到第19天断奶。益生菌处理是枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102(Calsporin,Calpis Co Ltd)。通过1mL单独的基于糖的凝胶溶液(安慰剂)或用枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102对个体仔猪口服治疗,每天一次。在第2、9、16和19天测量生长性能和产仔数。在第2天、第9天和第16天进行粪便评分和取样,以分类粪便稠度,并通过分离和计数方法进行微生物分析。结果:在断奶前阶段,安慰剂和益生菌处理的窝仔在生长性能、窝仔大小、死亡率和粪便稠度方面没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。与安慰剂相比,接受益生菌的窝仔中枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102(P<.001)、总芽孢杆菌种类(P<0.001)和总需氧菌(P=.03)的数量增加。乳酸杆菌、肠球菌、产气荚膜梭状芽孢杆菌和肠杆菌科的数量不受处理的影响。提示:每日口服枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102益生菌不会影响断奶前仔猪的生长性能和粪便稠度,只会影响芽孢杆菌类粪便微生物种群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Swine Health & Production (JSHAP) is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal published by the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) since 1993. The aim of the journal is the timely publication of peer-reviewed papers with a scope that encompasses the many domains of applied swine health and production, including the diagnosis, treatment, management, prevention and eradication of swine diseases, welfare & behavior, nutrition, public health, epidemiology, food safety, biosecurity, pharmaceuticals, antimicrobial use and resistance, reproduction, growth, systems flow, economics, and facility design. The journal provides a platform for researchers, veterinary practitioners, academics, and students to share their work with an international audience. The journal publishes information that contains an applied and practical focus and presents scientific information that is accessible to the busy veterinary practitioner as well as to the research and academic community. Hence, manuscripts with an applied focus are considered for publication, and the journal publishes original research, brief communications, case reports/series, literature reviews, commentaries, diagnostic notes, production tools, and practice tips. All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Swine Health & Production are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信