FIRE HISTORY OF AN OLD-GROWTH PONDEROSA PINE STAND IN THE SHEEP RANGE, DESERT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, NEVADA, USA

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
M. Kilpatrick, James Roberts, F. Biondi
{"title":"FIRE HISTORY OF AN OLD-GROWTH PONDEROSA PINE STAND IN THE SHEEP RANGE, DESERT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, NEVADA, USA","authors":"M. Kilpatrick, James Roberts, F. Biondi","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Southwestern ponderosa pine forests have experienced reduced fire frequency since Euro-American settlement generally because of successful fire suppression policies. We report here on the fire history of a ponderosa pine stand located in the Sheep Range, which is part of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge, in the Mojave Desert. A total of 22 dominant, fire-scarred ponderosa pines were sampled by taking 29 partial cross-sections and 18 wood increment cores. Maximum age of ponderosa pines at the study area exceeded 800 years, and sampled trees were often older than 500 years, so that the site tree-ring chronology covered 522 years (1490–2011). Crossdating revealed both extreme sensitivity and highly synchronous patterns, with the expressed population signal (EPS) exceeding 0.9 in 30-year moving windows throughout the length of the chronology. Fire statistics were calculated for the 1565–2011 period, during which at least 10 of the crossdated trees had been scarred and were recording fire. During the recorder period, there were 16 fires that met the two-tree minimum threshold, yielding a mean fire interval (MFI) of 25 years, a median fire interval (MedFI) of 15 years, and a Weibull median probability interval (WMPI) of 18 years; the point mean fire interval (PMFI) was 69 years. The longest fire-free intervals since 1565 occurred in the past two centuries, with 70 years (1862–1931) followed by another 80 years (1933–2012). The stand-wide 1932 fire is the last event recorded by the sampled trees. Overall there was reduced fire frequency from the late 19th Century to present compared to the previous three centuries. Because there is no record of active fire management in the study area, this finding is consistent with similar results obtained in two remote mountains of the Great Basin Desert, and points to a need for greater spatial coverage in fire history information, even for species that have been actively studied in other environments.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"127 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.2.127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Southwestern ponderosa pine forests have experienced reduced fire frequency since Euro-American settlement generally because of successful fire suppression policies. We report here on the fire history of a ponderosa pine stand located in the Sheep Range, which is part of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge, in the Mojave Desert. A total of 22 dominant, fire-scarred ponderosa pines were sampled by taking 29 partial cross-sections and 18 wood increment cores. Maximum age of ponderosa pines at the study area exceeded 800 years, and sampled trees were often older than 500 years, so that the site tree-ring chronology covered 522 years (1490–2011). Crossdating revealed both extreme sensitivity and highly synchronous patterns, with the expressed population signal (EPS) exceeding 0.9 in 30-year moving windows throughout the length of the chronology. Fire statistics were calculated for the 1565–2011 period, during which at least 10 of the crossdated trees had been scarred and were recording fire. During the recorder period, there were 16 fires that met the two-tree minimum threshold, yielding a mean fire interval (MFI) of 25 years, a median fire interval (MedFI) of 15 years, and a Weibull median probability interval (WMPI) of 18 years; the point mean fire interval (PMFI) was 69 years. The longest fire-free intervals since 1565 occurred in the past two centuries, with 70 years (1862–1931) followed by another 80 years (1933–2012). The stand-wide 1932 fire is the last event recorded by the sampled trees. Overall there was reduced fire frequency from the late 19th Century to present compared to the previous three centuries. Because there is no record of active fire management in the study area, this finding is consistent with similar results obtained in two remote mountains of the Great Basin Desert, and points to a need for greater spatial coverage in fire history information, even for species that have been actively studied in other environments.
美国内华达州沙漠国家野生动物保护区牧羊区一个古老黄松林的火灾历史
摘要:由于成功的灭火政策,自欧美定居以来,西南黄松森林的火灾频率普遍降低。我们在这里报道了位于绵羊岭的黄松林的火灾历史,绵羊岭是莫哈韦沙漠国家野生动物保护区的一部分。通过采集29个局部横截面和18个木材增量芯,共对22棵优势火伤黄松进行了采样。研究区域黄松的最大树龄超过800年,取样树木的树龄通常超过500年,因此现场树木年轮年表涵盖522年(1490-2011)。交叉测年揭示了极端敏感和高度同步的模式,在整个年表长度的30年移动窗口中,表达的群体信号(EPS)超过0.9。对1565年至2011年期间的火灾统计数据进行了计算,在此期间,至少有10棵过时的树木伤痕累累,并记录了火灾。在记录期内,有16起火灾达到了两棵树的最小阈值,平均火灾间隔(MFI)为25年,中位火灾间隔(MedFI)为15年,威布尔中位概率间隔(WMPI)为18年;点平均火灾间隔(PMFI)为69年。自1565年以来最长的无火灾间隔发生在过去两个世纪,分别为70年(1862年至1931年)和80年(1933年至2012年)。1932年的那场大火是被采样的树木记录的最后一次火灾。总体而言,与前三个世纪相比,19世纪末至今的火灾频率有所下降。由于研究区域没有主动火灾管理的记录,这一发现与在大盆地沙漠的两个偏远山区获得的类似结果一致,并表明火灾历史信息需要更大的空间覆盖范围,即使是在其他环境中积极研究的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree-Ring Research
Tree-Ring Research 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信