PROMoting the use of studies within a trial (PROMETHEUS): Results and experiences from a large programme to evaluate the routine embedding of recruitment and retention strategies within randomised controlled trials routinely

Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, C. Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, C. Hewitt, David J Beard, P. Bower, P. Brocklehurst, Cindy L. Cooper, L. Culliford, D. Devane, R. Emsley, S. Eldridge, Sandra Galvin, K. Gillies, A. Montgomery, C. Sutton, S. Treweek, D. Torgerson
{"title":"PROMoting the use of studies within a trial (PROMETHEUS): Results and experiences from a large programme to evaluate the routine embedding of recruitment and retention strategies within randomised controlled trials routinely","authors":"Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, C. Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, C. Hewitt, David J Beard, P. Bower, P. Brocklehurst, Cindy L. Cooper, L. Culliford, D. Devane, R. Emsley, S. Eldridge, Sandra Galvin, K. Gillies, A. Montgomery, C. Sutton, S. Treweek, D. Torgerson","doi":"10.1177/26320843221147841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim PROMoting THE USE of Studies Within A Trial (PROMETHEUS) aimed to improve the evidence base for recruiting and retaining participants in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) by pump-priming and facilitating the start of at least 25 Studies Within A Trial (SWATs) testing recruitment or retention interventions. Methods Ten Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) and one Primary Care Research Centre formed a network to conduct randomised SWATs of recruitment and/or retention strategies. We identified promising recruitment and retention interventions from various sources, which were reviewed by patient and public (PPI) partners to generate an initial priority list of seven recruitment and eight retention interventions. Host trial teams could apply for funding of up to £5000 and receive support from the PROMETHEUS team to design, implement, and report SWATs. We additionally tested the feasibility of undertaking coordinated SWATs across multiple host trials simultaneously. Results PROMETHEUS funded 42 SWATs, embedded within 31 host trials, across 12 CTUs. The SWAT cost per SWAT was £3535. Of the 42 SWATs, 12 tested the same SWAT in multiple trials (simultaneous SWAT design) and eight tested a factorial SWAT design. PROMETHEUS will add 18% and 79% more SWATs to the Cochrane systematic review of recruitment strategies and the Cochrane review of retention strategies respectively. Conclusion The PROMETHEUS programme substantially increased the evidence base for both recruitment and retention strategies within RCTs. Future research should adopt a systematic approach to identifying and targeting gaps in the evidence base and focus on translating SWAT evidence into recruitment and retention practice.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"113 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221147841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim PROMoting THE USE of Studies Within A Trial (PROMETHEUS) aimed to improve the evidence base for recruiting and retaining participants in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) by pump-priming and facilitating the start of at least 25 Studies Within A Trial (SWATs) testing recruitment or retention interventions. Methods Ten Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) and one Primary Care Research Centre formed a network to conduct randomised SWATs of recruitment and/or retention strategies. We identified promising recruitment and retention interventions from various sources, which were reviewed by patient and public (PPI) partners to generate an initial priority list of seven recruitment and eight retention interventions. Host trial teams could apply for funding of up to £5000 and receive support from the PROMETHEUS team to design, implement, and report SWATs. We additionally tested the feasibility of undertaking coordinated SWATs across multiple host trials simultaneously. Results PROMETHEUS funded 42 SWATs, embedded within 31 host trials, across 12 CTUs. The SWAT cost per SWAT was £3535. Of the 42 SWATs, 12 tested the same SWAT in multiple trials (simultaneous SWAT design) and eight tested a factorial SWAT design. PROMETHEUS will add 18% and 79% more SWATs to the Cochrane systematic review of recruitment strategies and the Cochrane review of retention strategies respectively. Conclusion The PROMETHEUS programme substantially increased the evidence base for both recruitment and retention strategies within RCTs. Future research should adopt a systematic approach to identifying and targeting gaps in the evidence base and focus on translating SWAT evidence into recruitment and retention practice.
促进试验中研究的使用(PROMETHEUS):来自大型项目的结果和经验,以评估随机对照试验中招募和保留策略的常规嵌入
目的促进试验内研究的使用(PROMETHEUS)旨在通过泵注启动和促进至少25项试验内研究(SWAT)测试招募或保留干预措施,改善招募和保留随机对照试验(RCT)参与者的证据基础。方法10个临床试验单位(CTU)和一个初级保健研究中心组成一个网络,对招募和/或保留策略进行随机SWAT。我们从各种来源确定了有前景的招募和保留干预措施,患者和公众(PPI)合作伙伴对这些干预措施进行了审查,以生成一份包含7项招募和8项保留干预措施的初始优先清单。主办试验团队可以申请高达5000英镑的资金,并获得PROMETHEUS团队的支持,以设计、实施和报告SWAT。我们还测试了同时在多个宿主试验中进行协调的SWAT的可行性。结果PROMETHEUS资助了42个SWAT,嵌入了12个CTU的31个宿主试验中。每个特警队的特警费用为3535英镑。在42项SWAT中,12项在多项试验中测试了相同的SWAT(同时SWAT设计),8项测试了析因SWAT设计。PROMETHEUS将在招聘策略的Cochrane系统审查和保留策略的Cocrane审查中分别增加18%和79%的SWAT。结论PROMETHEUS计划大大增加了随机对照试验中招募和保留策略的证据基础。未来的研究应采用系统的方法来识别和针对证据库中的差距,并侧重于将全部门办法的证据转化为招聘和留用实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信