Stenting the Snorkel: PCI of a Restenosed Left Main Stent Placed for Coronary Obstruction after Valve in Valve TAVR

H. El-Haddad, J. Resar
{"title":"Stenting the Snorkel: PCI of a Restenosed Left Main Stent Placed for Coronary Obstruction after Valve in Valve TAVR","authors":"H. El-Haddad, J. Resar","doi":"10.12945/J.JSHD.2019.030.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute coronary artery occlusion is a known compli-cation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. One bailout strategy to treat acute coronary artery occlusion is deployment of a “snorkel” stent from the coronary artery behind the TAVR valve. While this approach will restore coronary artery patency, the long-term concern of this method is the ability to re-intervene on the stented coronary artery in the future. We demon-strate the complexity of re-intervention in a case of acute coronary syndrome due to ostial restenosis of a “snorkel” stent. the Medtronic self-expanding valves, which extend above the coronary ostia by design [4, 5]. The risk of coronary occlusion is increased for valve-in-valve pro-cedures compared to native aortic valves and may be up to 3.5% [4]. Additionally, the height of the coronary ostium is not as straightforward a guide as in a native valve, due to the variable relationship between the native annulus and the bioprosthetic leaflets, and careful imaging is critical in order to understand the patient-specific anatomy [6]. The most common treatment strategy in the event of coronary obstruction during TAVR is PCI with stent deployment, and this is associated with a >90% success rate [4]. This is generally performed by pulling back and deploying a stent that has been pre-delivered to the coronary artery. Another novel option is intentional laceration of the aortic valve leaflet (BASILICA) [7]. With TAVR becoming increasingly common as the indications have expanded, so too will patients returning with coronary artery disease requiring intervention after TAVR.","PeriodicalId":92089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of structural heart disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of structural heart disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12945/J.JSHD.2019.030.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Acute coronary artery occlusion is a known compli-cation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. One bailout strategy to treat acute coronary artery occlusion is deployment of a “snorkel” stent from the coronary artery behind the TAVR valve. While this approach will restore coronary artery patency, the long-term concern of this method is the ability to re-intervene on the stented coronary artery in the future. We demon-strate the complexity of re-intervention in a case of acute coronary syndrome due to ostial restenosis of a “snorkel” stent. the Medtronic self-expanding valves, which extend above the coronary ostia by design [4, 5]. The risk of coronary occlusion is increased for valve-in-valve pro-cedures compared to native aortic valves and may be up to 3.5% [4]. Additionally, the height of the coronary ostium is not as straightforward a guide as in a native valve, due to the variable relationship between the native annulus and the bioprosthetic leaflets, and careful imaging is critical in order to understand the patient-specific anatomy [6]. The most common treatment strategy in the event of coronary obstruction during TAVR is PCI with stent deployment, and this is associated with a >90% success rate [4]. This is generally performed by pulling back and deploying a stent that has been pre-delivered to the coronary artery. Another novel option is intentional laceration of the aortic valve leaflet (BASILICA) [7]. With TAVR becoming increasingly common as the indications have expanded, so too will patients returning with coronary artery disease requiring intervention after TAVR.
Snorkel支架:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗TAVR瓣膜置换术后冠状动脉阻塞
急性冠状动脉闭塞是一种已知的经导管主动脉瓣置换术并发症。治疗急性冠状动脉闭塞的一种救援策略是在TAVR瓣膜后的冠状动脉上部署“通气管”支架。虽然这种方法可以恢复冠状动脉的通畅性,但这种方法的长期关注点是未来重新干预支架冠状动脉的能力。我们描述了一例因“通气管”支架口再狭窄引起的急性冠状动脉综合征患者再次干预的复杂性。美敦力自膨胀瓣膜,通过设计延伸至冠状动脉口上方[4,5]。与天然主动脉瓣相比,瓣中瓣手术的冠状动脉闭塞风险增加,可能高达3.5%[4]。此外,由于天然瓣环和生物瓣叶之间的可变关系,冠状动脉口的高度并不像天然瓣膜那样简单,仔细成像对于了解患者的特定解剖结构至关重要[6]。在TAVR期间发生冠状动脉阻塞的情况下,最常见的治疗策略是PCI和支架部署,这与>90%的成功率有关[4]。这通常是通过拉回和部署已经预先输送到冠状动脉的支架来进行的。另一种新的选择是故意撕裂主动脉瓣叶(BASILICA)[7]。随着适应症的扩大,TAVR越来越普遍,TAVR后需要干预的冠状动脉疾病患者也将越来越普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信