Japan, 1972: Visions of Masculinity in an Age of Mass Consumerism by Yoshikuni Igarashi (review)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Michele M. Mason
{"title":"Japan, 1972: Visions of Masculinity in an Age of Mass Consumerism by Yoshikuni Igarashi (review)","authors":"Michele M. Mason","doi":"10.1353/mni.2022.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benito Mussolini’s own valorization in the 1930s of “superior students” who could become “exemplary citizens” (p. 132). This connection gives a clear indication of Sasakawa’s own political leanings (which many of his later supporters and financial beneficiaries managed to overlook). The book relates a number of details concerning the American Occupation of Okinawa that might cause readers confusion. One of these is a suggestion, on page 23, that Okinawa was occupied by the US in 1944; in fact the Occupation took various forms but began with the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. Another misstatement, presumably based on Article 3 of the Treaty of San Francisco, is the suggestion on page 20 that “until 1972 Okinawa was a United Nations protectorate under de facto US control.” In the same section (again on page 23), Gerteis writes that Okinawa had been “retained as a US protectorate since 1952,” which is more accurate. Though the treaty stipulated that “Japan will concur in any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under its trusteeship system,” the US never fully implemented such a proposal. For that reason Okinawa was never formally party to a United Nations Trusteeship Agreement, in contrast to other former Japanese territories like the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and elsewhere. These are minor points in what is an undeniably important and perceptive book on Japanese society since the 1970s. Gerteis’s attention to the movements and political motivations of figures outside of the usual centers of power does much to invigorate our understanding of contemporary Japan.","PeriodicalId":54069,"journal":{"name":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","volume":"77 1","pages":"369 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benito Mussolini’s own valorization in the 1930s of “superior students” who could become “exemplary citizens” (p. 132). This connection gives a clear indication of Sasakawa’s own political leanings (which many of his later supporters and financial beneficiaries managed to overlook). The book relates a number of details concerning the American Occupation of Okinawa that might cause readers confusion. One of these is a suggestion, on page 23, that Okinawa was occupied by the US in 1944; in fact the Occupation took various forms but began with the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. Another misstatement, presumably based on Article 3 of the Treaty of San Francisco, is the suggestion on page 20 that “until 1972 Okinawa was a United Nations protectorate under de facto US control.” In the same section (again on page 23), Gerteis writes that Okinawa had been “retained as a US protectorate since 1952,” which is more accurate. Though the treaty stipulated that “Japan will concur in any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under its trusteeship system,” the US never fully implemented such a proposal. For that reason Okinawa was never formally party to a United Nations Trusteeship Agreement, in contrast to other former Japanese territories like the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and elsewhere. These are minor points in what is an undeniably important and perceptive book on Japanese society since the 1970s. Gerteis’s attention to the movements and political motivations of figures outside of the usual centers of power does much to invigorate our understanding of contemporary Japan.
日本,1972年:井原义国的《大众消费主义时代的男性化愿景》(综述)
贝尼托·墨索里尼(Benito Mussolini)在20世纪30年代对那些可以成为“模范公民”的“优等生”的推崇(第132页)。这种联系清楚地表明了Sasakawa自己的政治倾向(他的许多后来的支持者和经济受益人都忽略了这一点)。这本书讲述了美国占领冲绳的一些细节,可能会引起读者的困惑。其中之一是第23页的一条建议,即冲绳在1944年被美国占领;事实上,占领采取了各种形式,但始于1945年的冲绳战役。另一个错误陈述,可能是基于《旧金山条约》第3条,是第20页上的建议,即“直到1972年,冲绳一直是美国事实控制下的联合国保护国”。在同一节(再次在第23页)中,Gerteis写道,冲绳“自1952年以来一直作为美国保护国保留”,这更准确。尽管条约规定“日本将同意美国向联合国提出的任何将其置于托管制度之下的建议”,但美国从未完全实施过这一建议。因此,与马绍尔群岛、密克罗尼西亚和其他地方等其他前日本领土相比,冲绳从未正式加入《联合国托管协定》。这些都是一本自20世纪70年代以来关于日本社会的重要而敏锐的书中的要点。Gerteis对通常权力中心之外人物的运动和政治动机的关注在很大程度上增强了我们对当代日本的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Monumenta Nipponica was founded in 1938 by Sophia University, Tokyo, to provide a common platform for scholars throughout the world to present their research on Japanese culture, history, literature, and society. One of the oldest and most highly regarded English-language journals in the Asian studies field, it is known not only for articles of original scholarship and timely book reviews, but also for authoritative translations of a wide range of Japanese historical and literary sources. Previously published four times a year, since 2008 the journal has appeared semiannually, in May and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信