Refugee-background students negotiating academic literacy practices in L2: a dialogical and nexus analytical approach

IF 0.8 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Kirsi Leskinen
{"title":"Refugee-background students negotiating academic literacy practices in L2: a dialogical and nexus analytical approach","authors":"Kirsi Leskinen","doi":"10.1515/eujal-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored the academic literacies of multilingual refugee-background students who had completed some higher education studies before migrating to Finland. Previous studies have paid little attention to students like them. The research context is a pilot training programme integrating language and content studies. Applying dialogical and nexus analytical perspectives, the study investigated the sense-making processes of two key participants in a Finnish-medium accountancy course that formed part of the programme. The primary data, comprising interviews and video-recorded meetings between the students and their teachers and tutors, were analysed by applying dialogical interaction analysis and narrative analysis in a nexus analytical framework. The results show that the students actively tried to make sense of the target literacy practices. This was observed in negotiations related to the use of technology, norms on authorship and plagiarism, and autonomy in studying. The course was challenging for the students, possibly because their previous experiences and resources had not prepared them for what was expected of them either explicitly in instructions or more implicitly in institutional discourses. This article concludes that structures and practices can be exclusionary if no attention is paid to them and discusses ways of improving inclusiveness in higher education.","PeriodicalId":43181,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the academic literacies of multilingual refugee-background students who had completed some higher education studies before migrating to Finland. Previous studies have paid little attention to students like them. The research context is a pilot training programme integrating language and content studies. Applying dialogical and nexus analytical perspectives, the study investigated the sense-making processes of two key participants in a Finnish-medium accountancy course that formed part of the programme. The primary data, comprising interviews and video-recorded meetings between the students and their teachers and tutors, were analysed by applying dialogical interaction analysis and narrative analysis in a nexus analytical framework. The results show that the students actively tried to make sense of the target literacy practices. This was observed in negotiations related to the use of technology, norms on authorship and plagiarism, and autonomy in studying. The course was challenging for the students, possibly because their previous experiences and resources had not prepared them for what was expected of them either explicitly in instructions or more implicitly in institutional discourses. This article concludes that structures and practices can be exclusionary if no attention is paid to them and discusses ways of improving inclusiveness in higher education.
难民背景学生在第二语言中的学术素养实践:对话和联系分析方法
摘要本研究探讨了移民芬兰前完成高等教育的多语种难民背景学生的学术素养。以前的研究很少关注像他们这样的学生。研究背景是一个综合语言和内容研究的试点培训方案。应用对话和关系分析的观点,该研究调查了芬兰语媒介会计课程的两个关键参与者的意义形成过程,该课程是该方案的一部分。主要数据包括学生与教师和导师之间的访谈和视频记录会议,通过在联系分析框架中应用对话互动分析和叙事分析进行分析。结果表明,学生积极尝试理解目标识字练习。这在与技术使用、作者和抄袭规范以及学习自主权有关的谈判中都可以观察到。这门课程对学生来说很有挑战性,可能是因为他们以前的经验和资源并没有为他们所期望的做好准备,无论是明确的指导还是更含蓄的制度话语。本文的结论是,如果不加以注意,结构和实践可能是排他性的,并讨论了提高高等教育包容性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信