Uwharrie National Forest—An Ecological Gem in the North Carolina Piedmont

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Hunter Lewis, Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell, Joe Weber, J. Kupfer, Joshua Z. Merced, Gregory J. Carlton, Reilly T. Corkran, Amy E. Potter, P. Schmutz, M. J. Flynn, T. Allen, Meaghan E. Johnson, D. Hallac, Maegen L. Rochner, T. Patterson, K. J. Heeter, G. Harley, Lilian Hutchens, Peng Gao, Cade Gouin, Yujie Hu, J. Mossa
{"title":"Uwharrie National Forest—An Ecological Gem in the North Carolina Piedmont","authors":"Hunter Lewis, Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell, Joe Weber, J. Kupfer, Joshua Z. Merced, Gregory J. Carlton, Reilly T. Corkran, Amy E. Potter, P. Schmutz, M. J. Flynn, T. Allen, Meaghan E. Johnson, D. Hallac, Maegen L. Rochner, T. Patterson, K. J. Heeter, G. Harley, Lilian Hutchens, Peng Gao, Cade Gouin, Yujie Hu, J. Mossa","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The framing of national parks as \"America's best idea\" has undergone a multi-disciplinary critique for its failure to address the scarcity of racial minority visitors, particularly Black Americans. Slavery, segregation, and ongoing racial politics demand a process of unlearning and undoing by centering Black voices. This research seeks to re-examine Black Americans' motivations for and deterrents against visiting national parks using Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) as a preliminary case study. A review of archival documents (e.g., park history and promotional materials), interpretation programs, exhibits, and the racial composition of surrounding communities and park employees was conducted to identify gaps in Black Americans' representation within the core messages created and promoted by GSMNP. The results suggest that Black Americans are rarely seen in archival documents, and marginally represented in publicly accessible literature and exhibits. This legacy may send a message to Black Americans that the park is a \"White\" space, where their ancestors were treated as second-class citizens or excluded entirely. Under the shadow of Jim Crow laws, segregation, racism, and discrimination, this space may have been associated with danger or considered unsafe and unwelcoming. Our findings contribute to the broader understanding of how landscapes and institutions are racialized, and how the power of narrative can be used to dismantle racialization.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"63 1","pages":"1 - 118 - 119 - 122 - 123 - 126 - 14 - 15 - 3 - 35 - 36 - 4 - 5 - 53 - 54 - 6 - 77 - 78 - 97 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2023.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The framing of national parks as "America's best idea" has undergone a multi-disciplinary critique for its failure to address the scarcity of racial minority visitors, particularly Black Americans. Slavery, segregation, and ongoing racial politics demand a process of unlearning and undoing by centering Black voices. This research seeks to re-examine Black Americans' motivations for and deterrents against visiting national parks using Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) as a preliminary case study. A review of archival documents (e.g., park history and promotional materials), interpretation programs, exhibits, and the racial composition of surrounding communities and park employees was conducted to identify gaps in Black Americans' representation within the core messages created and promoted by GSMNP. The results suggest that Black Americans are rarely seen in archival documents, and marginally represented in publicly accessible literature and exhibits. This legacy may send a message to Black Americans that the park is a "White" space, where their ancestors were treated as second-class citizens or excluded entirely. Under the shadow of Jim Crow laws, segregation, racism, and discrimination, this space may have been associated with danger or considered unsafe and unwelcoming. Our findings contribute to the broader understanding of how landscapes and institutions are racialized, and how the power of narrative can be used to dismantle racialization.
Uwharrie国家森林-北卡罗莱纳州皮埃蒙特的生态宝石
将国家公园作为“美国最好的主意”的框架,由于未能解决少数民族游客,特别是美国黑人游客的稀缺问题,受到了多学科的批评。奴隶制、种族隔离和持续的种族政治需要一个以黑人的声音为中心的忘却和毁灭的过程。本研究以大烟山国家公园(Great Smoky Mountains national Park, GSMNP)为初步案例,试图重新审视美国黑人参观国家公园的动机和阻碍因素。通过对档案文件(如公园历史和宣传材料)、解说项目、展览以及周边社区和公园员工的种族构成进行审查,以确定美国黑人在GSMNP创建和推广的核心信息中的代表性差距。研究结果表明,美国黑人很少出现在档案文件中,在公共文献和展览中也很少出现。这一遗产可能会向美国黑人传递一个信息,即公园是一个“白人”空间,他们的祖先在这里被视为二等公民或被完全排除在外。在吉姆·克劳法、种族隔离、种族主义和歧视的阴影下,这个空间可能与危险联系在一起,或者被认为不安全、不受欢迎。我们的研究结果有助于更广泛地理解景观和制度是如何种族化的,以及如何利用叙事的力量来消除种族化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信