Italy’s national-unity government at the start of 2022: a coalition with an uncertain future

IF 2.2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
James L. Newell
{"title":"Italy’s national-unity government at the start of 2022: a coalition with an uncertain future","authors":"James L. Newell","doi":"10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we were going to press at the beginning of 2022, Italy’s governing coalition was showing signs of growing fragility. For one thing, the 2022 Finance Law had been greeted by widespread disappointment, including strike action by two of the three main tradeunion confederations, thanks to perceptions that it had largely failed to take the opportunity to get to grips with the growing inequality provoked by the pandemic. Tax reductions had seemed to involve greater benefits for those on middle and higher incomes than for those on lower incomes. The League, Forza Italia (FI), and Italia Viva (IV) had blocked a proposal – aimed at mobilizing the resources needed to help less welloff families cope with rising energy bills – to freeze the tax reliefs on incomes above €75,000. The plastic tax and the sugar tax, designed, respectively, to combat environmental pollution and obesity, had been postponed until 2023. The legislation was not presented to the Chamber of Deputies until the very last minute, to the detriment of the legislature’s capacity to properly scrutinize the proposals. Second, the Government was perceived in some quarters (e.g. Tundo 2021) to have reacted too slowly and with insufficient decisiveness to the arrival of the Omicron variant. Its decision – apparently the fruit of a classic compromise between diametrically opposed positions – to make Covid vaccinations obligatory, but only for the over-50s, and to limit the penalty for noncompliance to fines of €100, provoked satirical reactions from some. Finally, Prime Minister Mario Draghi was criticized by journalists for failing to hold a press conference to explain the new anti-Covid measures, leaving the task to the ministers for the civil service and public health, Renato Brunetta and Roberto Speranza, respectively. When, on 10 January, Draghi relented and appeared before journalists, he began by saying that he would not answer any questions concerning the forthcoming presidential elections – drawing the further criticism that his attitude betrayed a certain contempt for the role of the media in holding public office-holders to account in a democracy. So it was perhaps not surprising that early January polling suggested that the previously buoyant publicapproval ratings for both Draghi and the Government were now in clear decline. Against this background, it seemed more than likely that the outcome of the presidential elections, due to begin on 24 January, would be decisive for the future of the governing coalition. As readers familiar with Italian politics will know, presidents of the Republic are elected for 7-year terms by the members of the legislature (Deputies and Senators) and three representatives from each of the 20 regions with the exception of the small Valle d’Aosta that sends one representative. Election is by secret ballot without any formal nomination process, and requires a majority of two-thirds of the assembly at the first three ballots, after which an absolute majority suffices. President Sergio Mattarella’s term of office was due to expire on 3 February. The fundamental reason why election of his CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN POLITICS 2022, VOL. 14, NO. 1, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895","PeriodicalId":37572,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Italian Politics","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Italian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we were going to press at the beginning of 2022, Italy’s governing coalition was showing signs of growing fragility. For one thing, the 2022 Finance Law had been greeted by widespread disappointment, including strike action by two of the three main tradeunion confederations, thanks to perceptions that it had largely failed to take the opportunity to get to grips with the growing inequality provoked by the pandemic. Tax reductions had seemed to involve greater benefits for those on middle and higher incomes than for those on lower incomes. The League, Forza Italia (FI), and Italia Viva (IV) had blocked a proposal – aimed at mobilizing the resources needed to help less welloff families cope with rising energy bills – to freeze the tax reliefs on incomes above €75,000. The plastic tax and the sugar tax, designed, respectively, to combat environmental pollution and obesity, had been postponed until 2023. The legislation was not presented to the Chamber of Deputies until the very last minute, to the detriment of the legislature’s capacity to properly scrutinize the proposals. Second, the Government was perceived in some quarters (e.g. Tundo 2021) to have reacted too slowly and with insufficient decisiveness to the arrival of the Omicron variant. Its decision – apparently the fruit of a classic compromise between diametrically opposed positions – to make Covid vaccinations obligatory, but only for the over-50s, and to limit the penalty for noncompliance to fines of €100, provoked satirical reactions from some. Finally, Prime Minister Mario Draghi was criticized by journalists for failing to hold a press conference to explain the new anti-Covid measures, leaving the task to the ministers for the civil service and public health, Renato Brunetta and Roberto Speranza, respectively. When, on 10 January, Draghi relented and appeared before journalists, he began by saying that he would not answer any questions concerning the forthcoming presidential elections – drawing the further criticism that his attitude betrayed a certain contempt for the role of the media in holding public office-holders to account in a democracy. So it was perhaps not surprising that early January polling suggested that the previously buoyant publicapproval ratings for both Draghi and the Government were now in clear decline. Against this background, it seemed more than likely that the outcome of the presidential elections, due to begin on 24 January, would be decisive for the future of the governing coalition. As readers familiar with Italian politics will know, presidents of the Republic are elected for 7-year terms by the members of the legislature (Deputies and Senators) and three representatives from each of the 20 regions with the exception of the small Valle d’Aosta that sends one representative. Election is by secret ballot without any formal nomination process, and requires a majority of two-thirds of the assembly at the first three ballots, after which an absolute majority suffices. President Sergio Mattarella’s term of office was due to expire on 3 February. The fundamental reason why election of his CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN POLITICS 2022, VOL. 14, NO. 1, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895
2022年初的意大利民族团结政府:一个前途未卜的联合政府
正如我们将在2022年初发布的那样,意大利的执政联盟显示出越来越脆弱的迹象。首先,《2022年金融法》受到了广泛的失望,包括三个主要工会联合会中的两个采取了罢工行动,原因是人们认为,该法在很大程度上未能抓住机会解决疫情引发的日益严重的不平等问题。减税似乎给中高收入人群带来了比低收入人群更多的好处。联盟党、意大利力量党(Forza Italia)和意大利万岁党(Italia Viva)阻止了一项冻结收入超过7.5万欧元的税收减免的提案。该提案旨在动员所需的资源,帮助不太富裕的家庭应对不断上涨的能源账单。塑料税和糖税分别是为了对抗环境污染和肥胖而设计的,已被推迟到2023年。这项立法直到最后一刻才提交给众议院,这损害了立法机构适当审查提案的能力。其次,在某些方面(例如,Tundo 2021),政府被认为对Omicron改型的到来反应太慢,而且不够果断。欧盟决定强制接种新冠疫苗,但仅限于50岁以上的人,并将不遵守规定的罚款限制在100欧元以内,这一决定显然是截然相反的立场之间经典妥协的结果,引发了一些人的讽刺反应。最后,总理马里奥·德拉吉因未能召开新闻发布会解释新的抗疫措施而受到记者的批评,将任务分别交给了公务员部长雷纳托·布鲁内塔和公共卫生部长罗伯托·斯佩兰萨。1月10日,德拉吉态度缓和,出现在记者面前,他一开始就表示,他不会回答任何有关即将到来的总统选举的问题,这招致了进一步的批评,认为他的态度暴露了他对媒体在民主中要求公职人员负责的作用的某种蔑视。因此,1月初的民意调查显示,德拉吉和政府此前高涨的公众支持率现在明显下降,这也许并不奇怪。在这种背景下,定于1月24日开始的总统选举的结果似乎很可能对执政联盟的未来起决定性作用。熟悉意大利政治的读者都知道,共和国总统的任期为7年,由立法机构成员(众议员和参议员)和20个大区中每个大区的三名代表选举产生,除了小的瓦莱达奥斯塔(Valle d’aosta)派出一名代表。选举以无记名投票方式进行,没有任何正式的提名程序,在前三次投票中需要三分之二的议会多数,之后的绝对多数就足够了。塞尔吉奥·马塔雷拉总统的任期将于2月3日到期。《当代意大利政治》(2022)第14卷第1期。1,1 - 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2030895
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Italian Politics
Contemporary Italian Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Contemporary Italian Politics, formerly Bulletin of Italian Politics, is a political science journal aimed at academics and policy makers as well as others with a professional or intellectual interest in the politics of Italy. The journal has two main aims: Firstly, to provide rigorous analysis, in the English language, about the politics of what is one of the European Union’s four largest states in terms of population and Gross Domestic Product. We seek to do this aware that too often those in the English-speaking world looking for incisive analysis and insight into the latest trends and developments in Italian politics are likely to be stymied by two contrasting difficulties. On the one hand, they can turn to the daily and weekly print media. Here they will find information on the latest developments, sure enough; but much of it is likely to lack the incisiveness of academic writing and may even be straightforwardly inaccurate. On the other hand, readers can turn either to general political science journals – but here they will have to face the issue of fragmented information – or to specific journals on Italy – in which case they will find that politics is considered only insofar as it is part of the broader field of modern Italian studies[...] The second aim follows from the first insofar as, in seeking to achieve it, we hope thereby to provide analysis that readers will find genuinely useful. With research funding bodies of all kinds giving increasing emphasis to knowledge transfer and increasingly demanding of applicants that they demonstrate the relevance of what they are doing to non-academic ‘end users’, political scientists have a self-interested motive for attempting a closer engagement with outside practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信