{"title":"Prepositions with CP and their implications for extended projections","authors":"Peter Svenonius","doi":"10.1075/lv.00032.sve","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In some limited cases, English allows a particular preposition to combine with a certain kind of subordinate clause, as\n exemplified by in that in “I take the proposal seriously, in that I loathe it”. In contrast, Norwegian systematically\n allows prepositions to combine with subordinate clauses (as in Det resulterte i at vi vant, literally “It resulted in that\n we won”). I argue that the English case should be handled as the subcategorization for a certain complement class by a particular lexical\n entry, while the Norwegian case indicates that the extended projection of clauses can continue up to the preposition. This highlights an\n important difference between lexical selection and extended projection, revealing a hitherto underappreciated source of parametric\n variation, and sheds light on several properties of extended projections as well as of prepositions. Specifically, the extended projections\n of N and V may “converge” at P, challenging the notion of extended projection as being confined to a single lexical category.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00032.sve","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In some limited cases, English allows a particular preposition to combine with a certain kind of subordinate clause, as
exemplified by in that in “I take the proposal seriously, in that I loathe it”. In contrast, Norwegian systematically
allows prepositions to combine with subordinate clauses (as in Det resulterte i at vi vant, literally “It resulted in that
we won”). I argue that the English case should be handled as the subcategorization for a certain complement class by a particular lexical
entry, while the Norwegian case indicates that the extended projection of clauses can continue up to the preposition. This highlights an
important difference between lexical selection and extended projection, revealing a hitherto underappreciated source of parametric
variation, and sheds light on several properties of extended projections as well as of prepositions. Specifically, the extended projections
of N and V may “converge” at P, challenging the notion of extended projection as being confined to a single lexical category.
在某些有限的情况下,英语允许一个特定的介词与某一种从句结合,例如在“I take the proposal seriously, In that I loathe it”中。相比之下,挪威语系统地允许介词与从句结合使用(如Det resulterte i at vi vant,字面意思是“结果是我们赢了”)。我认为,英语的情况应该被处理为特定词汇条目对某个补语类的子分类,而挪威语的情况表明,子句的扩展投射可以继续到介词。这突出了词汇选择和扩展投射之间的重要区别,揭示了迄今为止未被充分认识的参数变化来源,并揭示了扩展投射和介词的几个特性。具体来说,N和V的扩展投影可能在P处“收敛”,挑战扩展投影局限于单一词汇范畴的概念。
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?