A preliminary evaluation of Crisis Plus: a model for working with frequent users of psychiatric crisis and inpatient services

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Ketan Sonigra, Lucy McIvor, J. Payne-Gill, Tim Smith, A. Beck
{"title":"A preliminary evaluation of Crisis Plus: a model for working with frequent users of psychiatric crisis and inpatient services","authors":"Ketan Sonigra, Lucy McIvor, J. Payne-Gill, Tim Smith, A. Beck","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-05-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is a proportion of psychiatric service users whose needs are not met by existing models of care. This can lead to a reliance on acute and crisis services. These service users may be considered high intensity users (HIUs). The purpose of this research is to evaluate the Crisis Plus model, an intervention designed to better support HIUs in the community and reduce dependency on acute and crisis services.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nForty-seven HIUs were involved in Crisis Plus. The core intervention of Crisis Plus was an Anticipatory Management Plan (AMP), produced in collaboration with service users, their families and their care coordinators. AMPs were shared with relevant services and attached to electronic patient notes to ensure a uniform, psychologically informed approach to care.\n\n\nFindings\nHIU service use was compared pre and post-AMP. On average, number of inpatient admissions, number of days spent on the ward, accepted psychiatric liaison referrals and accepted home treatment team (HTT) referrals decreased significantly.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCrisis Plus has taken a collaborative, proactive approach to engage HIUs, their families and the services that care for them. Crisis interventions that emphasise collaborative working and service user agency are key.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe provision of dedicated psychological support to HIUs and their professional and personal network is crucial to reduce reliance on acute and crisis care. Crisis Plus is unique in that it instigates co-production and active consultation with HIUs and services to improve clinical outcomes, in addition to reducing NHS expenditure.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-05-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose There is a proportion of psychiatric service users whose needs are not met by existing models of care. This can lead to a reliance on acute and crisis services. These service users may be considered high intensity users (HIUs). The purpose of this research is to evaluate the Crisis Plus model, an intervention designed to better support HIUs in the community and reduce dependency on acute and crisis services. Design/methodology/approach Forty-seven HIUs were involved in Crisis Plus. The core intervention of Crisis Plus was an Anticipatory Management Plan (AMP), produced in collaboration with service users, their families and their care coordinators. AMPs were shared with relevant services and attached to electronic patient notes to ensure a uniform, psychologically informed approach to care. Findings HIU service use was compared pre and post-AMP. On average, number of inpatient admissions, number of days spent on the ward, accepted psychiatric liaison referrals and accepted home treatment team (HTT) referrals decreased significantly. Practical implications Crisis Plus has taken a collaborative, proactive approach to engage HIUs, their families and the services that care for them. Crisis interventions that emphasise collaborative working and service user agency are key. Originality/value The provision of dedicated psychological support to HIUs and their professional and personal network is crucial to reduce reliance on acute and crisis care. Crisis Plus is unique in that it instigates co-production and active consultation with HIUs and services to improve clinical outcomes, in addition to reducing NHS expenditure.
Crisis Plus的初步评估:一个与精神病危机和住院服务频繁使用者合作的模型
目的有一部分精神科服务使用者的需求没有得到现有护理模式的满足。这可能导致对紧急和危机服务的依赖。这些业务用户可被视为高强度用户(hiu)。本研究的目的是评估Crisis Plus模型,这是一种旨在更好地支持社区hiu并减少对急性和危机服务依赖的干预措施。设计/方法/方法47个hiu参与了Crisis Plus。“危机+”的核心干预措施是与服务使用者、其家庭及其护理协调员合作制定的一项预期管理计划。amp与相关服务共享,并附在电子病历上,以确保采用统一的、心理知情的护理方法。对比amp前后的服务使用情况。平均而言,住院人数、住院天数、接受精神科联络转介和接受家庭治疗小组(HTT)转介均显著下降。“危机+”项目采取了一种合作、积极的方式,让hiu、他们的家人和照顾他们的服务机构参与进来。强调协同工作和服务用户代理的危机干预措施是关键。独创性/价值为hiu及其专业和个人网络提供专门的心理支持对于减少对急性和危机护理的依赖至关重要。危机Plus的独特之处在于,除了减少NHS支出外,它还鼓励与hiu和服务机构合作生产和积极协商,以改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信