The effect of political connections and governance on credit ratings: substitution versus complementary view: case of Tunisian firm

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Wided Bouaine, Karima Alaya, C. Slim
{"title":"The effect of political connections and governance on credit ratings: substitution versus complementary view: case of Tunisian firm","authors":"Wided Bouaine, Karima Alaya, C. Slim","doi":"10.1108/jaee-10-2022-0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe objective of this paper is to study the impact of political connection and governance on credit rating and whether there is a substitution or complementary relationship between them.Design/methodology/approachIn order to achieve the objective, a succession of eight ordered probit regressions has been carried out. Moderating variables between the political connection and governance characteristics were introduced. The whole population is taken as a sample, i.e., 27 Tunisian companies that are evaluated by FITSH NORTH AFRICA agencies over a period of 10 years (2009–2018).FindingsThe outcomes are mixed. They show that the political connection does not always influence credit rating; the size and board independence always improves credit rating; the duality between the functions affects credit rating; whereas the majorities’ proportion does not influence credit rating; and a substitution between the political connection and the governance characteristics is validated.Research limitations/implicationsLike any other research, our results are factors of our measures and variable choice and depends heavily on the how these variables were conceived. Also, although our number of observations responds to the statistical result generalization requirements, our sample remains relatively narrow with 27 companies only.Practical implicationsIn practice, the research will allow investors to have a better vision upon the future of their investments based on whether to develop their governance system or promote political networking. It will also prompt lenders to look beyond ratings and consider factors such as political connections to make a rational judgment on their future placements.Social implicationsThis study leads us to find various solutions: the establishment of credit agencies that take into consideration all the data of all the operators taken as a whole (bank, leasing company, and factoring). It encourages the reorganization of the Tunisian banking sector through mergers for example.Originality/valueThis study is a pioneer in the credit rating field in Tunisia, where the source of debt financing is the most used by all enterprises across all sectors. This study extends the literature of political connection effectiveness, independent directors, board size, in improving corporate performance and credit rating.","PeriodicalId":45702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-10-2022-0286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe objective of this paper is to study the impact of political connection and governance on credit rating and whether there is a substitution or complementary relationship between them.Design/methodology/approachIn order to achieve the objective, a succession of eight ordered probit regressions has been carried out. Moderating variables between the political connection and governance characteristics were introduced. The whole population is taken as a sample, i.e., 27 Tunisian companies that are evaluated by FITSH NORTH AFRICA agencies over a period of 10 years (2009–2018).FindingsThe outcomes are mixed. They show that the political connection does not always influence credit rating; the size and board independence always improves credit rating; the duality between the functions affects credit rating; whereas the majorities’ proportion does not influence credit rating; and a substitution between the political connection and the governance characteristics is validated.Research limitations/implicationsLike any other research, our results are factors of our measures and variable choice and depends heavily on the how these variables were conceived. Also, although our number of observations responds to the statistical result generalization requirements, our sample remains relatively narrow with 27 companies only.Practical implicationsIn practice, the research will allow investors to have a better vision upon the future of their investments based on whether to develop their governance system or promote political networking. It will also prompt lenders to look beyond ratings and consider factors such as political connections to make a rational judgment on their future placements.Social implicationsThis study leads us to find various solutions: the establishment of credit agencies that take into consideration all the data of all the operators taken as a whole (bank, leasing company, and factoring). It encourages the reorganization of the Tunisian banking sector through mergers for example.Originality/valueThis study is a pioneer in the credit rating field in Tunisia, where the source of debt financing is the most used by all enterprises across all sectors. This study extends the literature of political connection effectiveness, independent directors, board size, in improving corporate performance and credit rating.
政治关系和治理对信用评级的影响:替代与补充观点——以突尼斯公司为例
目的本文的目的是研究政治联系和治理对信用评级的影响,以及它们之间是否存在替代或互补关系。设计/方法/方法为了实现这一目标,进行了一系列八阶probit回归。介绍了政治联系与治理特征之间的调节变量。以整个人群为样本,即FITSH北非机构在10年(2009-2018年)内评估的27家突尼斯公司。结果喜忧参半。它们表明,政治联系并不总是影响信用评级;规模和董事会的独立性总是提高信用评级;功能的双重性影响信用评级;而多数人的比例不影响信用评级;并验证了政治联系与治理特征之间的替代性。研究局限性/含义与任何其他研究一样,我们的结果是我们衡量标准和变量选择的因素,在很大程度上取决于这些变量是如何构思的。此外,尽管我们的观察数量符合统计结果概括的要求,但我们的样本仍然相对狭窄,只有27家公司。实际意义在实践中,这项研究将使投资者根据是发展治理体系还是促进政治网络,对其投资的未来有更好的愿景。这也将促使贷款人超越评级,考虑政治关系等因素,对未来的安置做出理性判断。社会含义这项研究使我们找到了各种解决方案:建立信贷机构,将所有运营商(银行、租赁公司和保理商)的所有数据作为一个整体来考虑。它鼓励通过兼并等方式重组突尼斯银行业。独创性/价值这项研究是突尼斯信用评级领域的先驱,突尼斯所有部门的所有企业都使用最多的债务融资来源。本研究扩展了政治联系有效性、独立董事、董事会规模在改善公司绩效和信用评级方面的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
38
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信