Educational Leadership and Management during COVID-19: A Call for Criticality and the Legitimation of Social Theory

F. Kajee
{"title":"Educational Leadership and Management during COVID-19: A Call for Criticality and the Legitimation of Social Theory","authors":"F. Kajee","doi":"10.29086/2519-5476/2021/v28n1a17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research internationally and nationally highlights that the field of Educational Leadership and Management (ELM) has pressing problems. One of the problems emanates from existing theory in the field which has been chiefly concerned with efficiency and organisational functioning. With the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the already existing reduction in leadership as an organisational phenomenon, this paper argues that these problems are exacerbated if leadership is not viewed as a social phenomenon. Drawing on the theoretical tenets from a doctoral study which focused on master’s coursework programmes in ELM at six South African universities, this paper commences by providing a genealogy of the field using ‘frames’ (functionalist, subjectivist, and critical). Trends from this genealogy are then surfaced and critiqued. The paper calls for a critical stance and argues that adopting social theory is essential to surface and address inequality and social justice issues in leading during the COVID-19 pandemic. A curriculum leadership case during the COVID-19 pandemic of adopting the Legitimation Code Theory as a social theory is offered for illustrative purposes.","PeriodicalId":90425,"journal":{"name":"Alternation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2021/v28n1a17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research internationally and nationally highlights that the field of Educational Leadership and Management (ELM) has pressing problems. One of the problems emanates from existing theory in the field which has been chiefly concerned with efficiency and organisational functioning. With the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the already existing reduction in leadership as an organisational phenomenon, this paper argues that these problems are exacerbated if leadership is not viewed as a social phenomenon. Drawing on the theoretical tenets from a doctoral study which focused on master’s coursework programmes in ELM at six South African universities, this paper commences by providing a genealogy of the field using ‘frames’ (functionalist, subjectivist, and critical). Trends from this genealogy are then surfaced and critiqued. The paper calls for a critical stance and argues that adopting social theory is essential to surface and address inequality and social justice issues in leading during the COVID-19 pandemic. A curriculum leadership case during the COVID-19 pandemic of adopting the Legitimation Code Theory as a social theory is offered for illustrative purposes.
新冠肺炎期间的教育领导与管理:对社会理论批判与合法化的呼唤
国际和国内的研究表明,教育领导与管理(ELM)领域存在着迫切的问题。其中一个问题源于该领域的现有理论,这些理论主要涉及效率和组织功能。随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的爆发,以及领导力作为一种组织现象已经存在的减少,本文认为,如果不将领导力视为一种社会现象,这些问题会加剧。根据一项博士研究的理论原则,该研究集中在南非六所大学的ELM硕士课程项目上,本文首先使用“框架”(功能主义、主观主义和批判主义)提供了该领域的谱系。这一谱系的趋势随后浮出水面并受到批评。本文呼吁采取批判立场,并认为采用社会理论是在新冠肺炎大流行期间揭示和解决领导中的不平等和社会正义问题的关键。本文以新冠肺炎大流行期间将合法化法典理论作为社会理论的课程领导案例为例进行说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信