Pinus ponderosa climate/growth responses: Climate-growth responses from Pinus ponderosa trees using multiple measures of annual radial growth

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
P. T. Soulé, Justin T. Maxwell, P. Knapp
{"title":"Pinus ponderosa climate/growth responses: Climate-growth responses from Pinus ponderosa trees using multiple measures of annual radial growth","authors":"P. T. Soulé, Justin T. Maxwell, P. Knapp","doi":"10.3959/TRR2017-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When using old-growth trees from semiarid, open-canopy environments, basal area increment (BAI), an absolute measure of radial growth, is sometimes used instead of the more commonly used ‘conservative techniques’ (negative exponential or linear regression with a negative slope; NegX) because narrow rings have been shown to potentially bias results. In this study we explore the relationship between radial growth of ponderosa pine from four study sites in Montana and climate (temperature, precipitation, drought severity) using unstandardized raw ring width and BAI values, and standardized values generated via Friedman Super Smoother and NegX. All sites are minimally disturbed, and our selection criteria is limited to older (interior dates pre-A.D. 1850 at breast height) trees growing in open-canopy environments free of visible disturbance such as lightning strikes. We found the strongest relationships (r > 0.60) with radial growth with July and prior-year October Palmer Drought Severity Index value...","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/TRR2017-18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT When using old-growth trees from semiarid, open-canopy environments, basal area increment (BAI), an absolute measure of radial growth, is sometimes used instead of the more commonly used ‘conservative techniques’ (negative exponential or linear regression with a negative slope; NegX) because narrow rings have been shown to potentially bias results. In this study we explore the relationship between radial growth of ponderosa pine from four study sites in Montana and climate (temperature, precipitation, drought severity) using unstandardized raw ring width and BAI values, and standardized values generated via Friedman Super Smoother and NegX. All sites are minimally disturbed, and our selection criteria is limited to older (interior dates pre-A.D. 1850 at breast height) trees growing in open-canopy environments free of visible disturbance such as lightning strikes. We found the strongest relationships (r > 0.60) with radial growth with July and prior-year October Palmer Drought Severity Index value...
黄松气候/生长响应:利用多种年径向生长测量的黄松树木的气候-生长响应
当使用来自半干旱、开放冠层环境的古树时,有时使用基面积增量(BAI)作为径向生长的绝对度量,而不是更常用的“保守技术”(负斜率的负指数或线性回归;NegX),因为窄环已被证明可能会对结果产生偏差。在这项研究中,我们利用未标准化的原始环宽度和BAI值,以及通过Friedman Super smooth和NegX生成的标准化值,探索蒙大拿州四个研究地点黄松径向生长与气候(温度、降水、干旱严重程度)之间的关系。所有的地点都是最小的干扰,我们的选择标准仅限于更古老的(公元前的内部日期)。(1850年(胸围高度)生长在开阔树冠环境中的树木,没有可见的干扰,如雷击。我们发现径向增长与7月和前一年10月Palmer干旱严重指数值的关系最强(r > 0.60)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree-Ring Research
Tree-Ring Research 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信