Radical-right Parties in Militant Democracies: How the Alternative for Germany’s Strategic Frontstage Moderation Undermines Militant Measures

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1017/S157401962200030X

Franziska Brandmann

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Democratic defence – Germany’s militant democracy – militant measures against radical-right parties – targeted organisations in militant democracies not passive recipients of militant measures – actions taken by targeted organisations – parties engaging in frontstage moderation to shield the party from militant measures – alternative for Germany shielding the party from militant measures by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution

查看原文本刊更多论文

激进民主国家中的极右翼政党:德国战略性前场节制的替代方案如何破坏激进措施

民主防御——德国的激进民主——针对激进右翼政党的激进措施——激进民主国家的目标组织，而不是激进措施的被动接受者——目标组织采取的行动——政党参与前期温和行动，以保护政党免受激进措施的影响——德国保护政党免受武装分子袭击的替代方案宪法保护办公室的措施

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.