{"title":"It’s time to measure the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions","authors":"E. Duncan","doi":"10.1177/03080226231172628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, The Royal College of Occupational Therapists and the James Lind Alliance released their top ten research priorities for occupational therapy (Watson et al., 2021). Their fourth priority highlighted an important and under-researched question: what are the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions? Despite occupational therapy research developing exponentially over the last 20 years, surprisingly little research has been undertaken to investigate the longterm benefits of many occupational therapy interventions. In our current economically challenging health landscape, consideration needs to be given to de-implementing interventions that do not demonstrate a sustained difference in people’s lives. Therefore, now more than ever, evaluating the long-term benefits of new and established occupational therapy interventions is crucial to understand their impact on people’s quality of life over time. Conducting high-quality long-term follow-up intervention studies is challenging (Signorell et al., 2022; Wilcox and Ely, 2019). Higher levels of research funding are required to follow up participants over a longer period of time. Participant attrition is considerable in any long-term outcome study as people often drop out of long-term studies and are lost to follow-up. This in turn can lead to smaller sample sizes, diminished returns, limiting and potentially biasing study findings. Strategies to reduce study attrition, such as clear communication of expectations, study incentives such as gift cards, cash or other rewards, personalised communication and follow-up of participants, positive reinforcement and collaboration with participants in the study design have all been shown to help reduce study attrition (Gillies et al., 2021) and should be employed in long-term effectiveness studies. Measuring outcomes over a long period of time can be difficult, as some outcomes change gradually, while others may change rapidly. Finally, long-term data management can become increasingly complex and it can be challenging to ensure that data are collected, stored, and analysed correctly. Many of these challenges can be overcome with advice from clinical trial units and experienced methodologists, who are essential collaborators in any study of this nature. However, preceding all of these challenges is a more theoretical question that should be answered by all occupational therapists who are designing or implementing an intervention: How will this intervention produce the sustained outcomes it aims to? Meaningfully answering this question will enable occupational therapists to articulate how they understand their interventions work, support research funding applications to measure the intervention’s impact, and guide the intervention’s long-term evaluation. Not all occupational therapists are required to understand the methodological challenges of studying the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions. However, all occupational therapists should be able to articulate the theory of how they believe their interventions will achieve the longterm outcomes they envisage. Given the challenges of studying long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions, it is important to carefully consider if a specific intervention merits such investigation. Having decided your research question is important (Taylor et al., 2023), an important next step is to articulate how you believe an occupational therapy intervention will achieve its intended outcomes. The latest version of the ‘Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions’ proposes the development of a Logic Model as a useful way to communicate how an intervention is believed to work (Skivington et al., 2021). Logic Models at their simplest are linear pathways that provide visual representations of the key stages of an intervention, including inputs (what you need to deliver the intervention), activities (what you do during the intervention), outputs (what happens as a result) and outcomes (what are the immediate, mediumand longterm impacts of the intervention). In providing a clear model of how an intervention is believed to work, Logic Models provide a simplified series of ‘If-Then’ relationships that It’s time to measure the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"86 1","pages":"465 - 466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231172628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2021, The Royal College of Occupational Therapists and the James Lind Alliance released their top ten research priorities for occupational therapy (Watson et al., 2021). Their fourth priority highlighted an important and under-researched question: what are the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions? Despite occupational therapy research developing exponentially over the last 20 years, surprisingly little research has been undertaken to investigate the longterm benefits of many occupational therapy interventions. In our current economically challenging health landscape, consideration needs to be given to de-implementing interventions that do not demonstrate a sustained difference in people’s lives. Therefore, now more than ever, evaluating the long-term benefits of new and established occupational therapy interventions is crucial to understand their impact on people’s quality of life over time. Conducting high-quality long-term follow-up intervention studies is challenging (Signorell et al., 2022; Wilcox and Ely, 2019). Higher levels of research funding are required to follow up participants over a longer period of time. Participant attrition is considerable in any long-term outcome study as people often drop out of long-term studies and are lost to follow-up. This in turn can lead to smaller sample sizes, diminished returns, limiting and potentially biasing study findings. Strategies to reduce study attrition, such as clear communication of expectations, study incentives such as gift cards, cash or other rewards, personalised communication and follow-up of participants, positive reinforcement and collaboration with participants in the study design have all been shown to help reduce study attrition (Gillies et al., 2021) and should be employed in long-term effectiveness studies. Measuring outcomes over a long period of time can be difficult, as some outcomes change gradually, while others may change rapidly. Finally, long-term data management can become increasingly complex and it can be challenging to ensure that data are collected, stored, and analysed correctly. Many of these challenges can be overcome with advice from clinical trial units and experienced methodologists, who are essential collaborators in any study of this nature. However, preceding all of these challenges is a more theoretical question that should be answered by all occupational therapists who are designing or implementing an intervention: How will this intervention produce the sustained outcomes it aims to? Meaningfully answering this question will enable occupational therapists to articulate how they understand their interventions work, support research funding applications to measure the intervention’s impact, and guide the intervention’s long-term evaluation. Not all occupational therapists are required to understand the methodological challenges of studying the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions. However, all occupational therapists should be able to articulate the theory of how they believe their interventions will achieve the longterm outcomes they envisage. Given the challenges of studying long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions, it is important to carefully consider if a specific intervention merits such investigation. Having decided your research question is important (Taylor et al., 2023), an important next step is to articulate how you believe an occupational therapy intervention will achieve its intended outcomes. The latest version of the ‘Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions’ proposes the development of a Logic Model as a useful way to communicate how an intervention is believed to work (Skivington et al., 2021). Logic Models at their simplest are linear pathways that provide visual representations of the key stages of an intervention, including inputs (what you need to deliver the intervention), activities (what you do during the intervention), outputs (what happens as a result) and outcomes (what are the immediate, mediumand longterm impacts of the intervention). In providing a clear model of how an intervention is believed to work, Logic Models provide a simplified series of ‘If-Then’ relationships that It’s time to measure the long-term effects of occupational therapy interventions
2021年,皇家职业治疗师学院和詹姆斯·林德联盟发布了职业治疗的十大研究重点(Watson et al., 2021)。他们的第四个优先事项强调了一个重要但研究不足的问题:职业治疗干预的长期影响是什么?尽管职业治疗研究在过去20年里呈指数增长,但令人惊讶的是,很少有研究对许多职业治疗干预措施的长期效益进行调查。在我们目前经济上具有挑战性的卫生状况下,需要考虑取消那些不能证明对人们的生活产生持续影响的干预措施。因此,现在比以往任何时候都更需要评估新的和已建立的职业治疗干预措施的长期效益,以了解它们对人们生活质量的影响。开展高质量的长期随访干预研究具有挑战性(Signorell等人,2022;Wilcox and Ely, 2019)。为了对参与者进行更长时间的随访,需要更高水平的研究经费。参与者流失在任何长期结果研究中都是相当大的,因为人们经常退出长期研究并失去随访。这反过来又会导致样本量减少,收益减少,研究结果受到限制并可能存在偏差。减少研究损耗的策略,如明确传达期望、研究激励(如礼品卡、现金或其他奖励)、参与者的个性化沟通和随访、在研究设计中与参与者的积极强化和合作,都被证明有助于减少研究损耗(Gillies et al., 2021),应该在长期有效性研究中采用。衡量长期的结果可能很困难,因为有些结果会逐渐改变,而另一些可能会迅速改变。最后,长期数据管理可能会变得越来越复杂,确保正确收集、存储和分析数据可能具有挑战性。在临床试验单位和经验丰富的方法学家的建议下,许多这些挑战都可以克服,他们是任何此类研究的重要合作者。然而,在所有这些挑战之前,有一个更理论化的问题,应该由所有设计或实施干预的职业治疗师来回答:这种干预将如何产生其目标的持续结果?有意义地回答这个问题将使职业治疗师能够阐明他们如何理解他们的干预工作,支持研究基金申请来衡量干预的影响,并指导干预的长期评估。并非所有的职业治疗师都需要了解研究职业治疗干预的长期影响的方法学挑战。然而,所有的职业治疗师都应该能够清晰地表达出他们如何相信他们的干预将达到他们设想的长期结果的理论。考虑到研究职业治疗干预的长期影响的挑战,仔细考虑特定的干预是否值得这样的研究是很重要的。确定你的研究问题是重要的(Taylor et al., 2023),重要的下一步是阐明你如何相信职业治疗干预将实现其预期结果。最新版本的“复杂干预措施的发展和评估框架”提出了一种逻辑模型的发展,作为一种有效的方式来沟通干预措施是如何被认为是有效的(Skivington等人,2021)。逻辑模型最简单的是线性路径,它提供了干预的关键阶段的可视化表示,包括输入(提供干预需要什么)、活动(在干预期间你做了什么)、输出(结果发生了什么)和结果(干预的即时、中期和长期影响是什么)。逻辑模型提供了一个清晰的模型,说明干预措施是如何起作用的,它提供了一系列简化的“如果-那么”关系,表明是时候衡量职业治疗干预措施的长期效果了
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.