Density effects on native and non-native trout survival in streams

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Brock M. Huntsman, Lauren Flynn, Colleen A. Caldwell, Abigail J. Lynch, Fitsum Abadi
{"title":"Density effects on native and non-native trout survival in streams","authors":"Brock M. Huntsman,&nbsp;Lauren Flynn,&nbsp;Colleen A. Caldwell,&nbsp;Abigail J. Lynch,&nbsp;Fitsum Abadi","doi":"10.1111/eff.12699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental stressors associated with a changing climate and non-native fish, individually, represent significant threats to native fish conservation. These threats can exacerbate risks to native fishes when conditions interact at the trailing edge of a population's distribution. We collected capture–mark–recapture data for Rio Grande cutthroat trout (RGCT, <i>Oncorhynchus clarkii virginalis</i>) at the trailing edge of all cutthroat trout distributions from eight northern New Mexico populations. We used a factorial sampling design from streams characterised as “cool” or “warm” and whether RGCT were sympatric with non-native brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>). We tested competing hypotheses that warm temperatures, reduced flows, high densities and sympatry with brown trout would negatively impact RGCT apparent survival rates. We found the strongest evidence for a non-native trout interaction with total trout density affecting RGCT apparent survival rates. Our results are consistent with patterns observed in northern cutthroat trout populations where non-native salmonids negatively impacted apparent survival rates. We also found that a negative density effect was observed on allopatric RGCT and sympatric brown trout apparent survival, but a positive density effect was observed for sympatric RGCT. These results suggest higher density populations of RGCT may be more resilient to displacement by non-native trout than low-density populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11422,"journal":{"name":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","volume":"32 2","pages":"464-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eff.12699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental stressors associated with a changing climate and non-native fish, individually, represent significant threats to native fish conservation. These threats can exacerbate risks to native fishes when conditions interact at the trailing edge of a population's distribution. We collected capture–mark–recapture data for Rio Grande cutthroat trout (RGCT, Oncorhynchus clarkii virginalis) at the trailing edge of all cutthroat trout distributions from eight northern New Mexico populations. We used a factorial sampling design from streams characterised as “cool” or “warm” and whether RGCT were sympatric with non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta). We tested competing hypotheses that warm temperatures, reduced flows, high densities and sympatry with brown trout would negatively impact RGCT apparent survival rates. We found the strongest evidence for a non-native trout interaction with total trout density affecting RGCT apparent survival rates. Our results are consistent with patterns observed in northern cutthroat trout populations where non-native salmonids negatively impacted apparent survival rates. We also found that a negative density effect was observed on allopatric RGCT and sympatric brown trout apparent survival, but a positive density effect was observed for sympatric RGCT. These results suggest higher density populations of RGCT may be more resilient to displacement by non-native trout than low-density populations.

密度对溪流中本地和非本地鳟鱼生存的影响
与气候变化和非本地鱼类相关的环境压力因素对本地鱼类的保护构成了重大威胁。当种群分布的后缘条件相互作用时,这些威胁会加剧本地鱼类的风险。在新墨西哥州北部8个切喉鳟鱼种群分布的尾缘处收集了格兰德河切喉鳟鱼(RGCT, Oncorhynchus clarkii virginalis)的捕获-标记-再捕获数据。我们从“冷”或“暖”的溪流中使用了一个因子抽样设计,以确定RGCT是否与非本地褐鳟(Salmo trutta)共域。我们测试了一些相互竞争的假设,即温暖的温度、流量减少、高密度和与褐鳟的共生关系会对RGCT的表观存活率产生负面影响。我们发现了非本地鳟鱼与鳟鱼总密度相互作用影响RGCT表观存活率的最有力证据。我们的结果与在北方割喉鳟鱼种群中观察到的模式一致,在那里,非本地鲑鱼对表观存活率产生了负面影响。研究还发现,同域褐鳟表观存活率存在负密度效应,而同域褐鳟表观存活率存在正密度效应。这些结果表明,密度较高的RGCT种群可能比低密度种群更能适应非本地鳟鱼的迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Ecology of Freshwater Fish 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology of Freshwater Fish publishes original contributions on all aspects of fish ecology in freshwater environments, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and streams. Manuscripts involving ecologically-oriented studies of behavior, conservation, development, genetics, life history, physiology, and host-parasite interactions are welcomed. Studies involving population ecology and community ecology are also of interest, as are evolutionary approaches including studies of population biology, evolutionary ecology, behavioral ecology, and historical ecology. Papers addressing the life stages of anadromous and catadromous species in estuaries and inshore coastal zones are considered if they contribute to the general understanding of freshwater fish ecology. Theoretical and modeling studies are suitable if they generate testable hypotheses, as are those with implications for fisheries. Manuscripts presenting analyses of published data are considered if they produce novel conclusions or syntheses. The journal publishes articles, fresh perspectives, and reviews and, occasionally, the proceedings of conferences and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信