Construction of an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers using the Delphi method

Frontiers of Nursing Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.002

Shi-Fan Han , Rui-Fang Zhu , Jin-Lian Cheng , Yan Cao

{"title":"Construction of an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers using the Delphi method","authors":"Shi-Fan Han , Rui-Fang Zhu , Jin-Lian Cheng , Yan Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument (0.547), new evidence (0.345), and new conclusion (0.109).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high; therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers.

Methods

A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined.

Results

An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument (0.547), new evidence (0.345), and new conclusion (0.109).

Conclusions

The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high; therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

运用德尔菲法构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系

目的构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系。方法对17名护理专家进行2轮咨询，确定构建的护理论文创新评价指标体系的信度和权重。结果构建了护理论文创新性评价体系，包括3个一级指标、8个二级指标、14个三级指标和8个四级指标。3个主要指标及其权重分别为新论点(0.547)、新证据(0.345)和新结论(0.109)。结论专家的代表性、研究积极性、权威性、协调性、收敛性较高;因此，基于德尔菲法的护理论文创新性评价指标体系能够全面、科学地评价护理论文的创新性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Frontiers of Nursing

自引率

0.00%

发文量

353