A Critique of Torleif Elgvin’s Reconstructions of 1QSamuel

IF 0.2 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1515/zaw-2021-0005

Benjamin Ziemer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article by Torleif Elgvin in ZAW 132/2 (2020): 281–300 fails in the material reconstruction of 1QSam. Considering the different width of the columns correctly, the manuscript could well have contained all parts of 2Sam 20–23 which makes further speculations superfluous.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Torleif elgvin的重建1QSamuel

摘要Torleif Elgvin在ZAW 132/2（2020）中的文章：281–300在1QSam的材料重建中失败。考虑到柱子的宽度不同，手稿很可能包含2Sam 20–23的所有部分，这使得进一步的猜测变得多余。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, which is published in four issues of 160 pages each plus supplements, has been the leading international and interconfessional periodical in the field of research in the Old Testament und Early Judaism for over one hundred years. Open to various ways of posing the questions of scholarship, the journal features high quality contributions in English, German, and French. Through its review of periodicals and books, it provides fast and reliable information concerning new publications in the field.