A comparative study of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with pectoral nerve block type II in breast surgeries

S. Amir, Kulsum Sheikh, Q. Ali, O. Siddiqui, S. Arman
{"title":"A comparative study of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with pectoral nerve block type II in breast surgeries","authors":"S. Amir, Kulsum Sheikh, Q. Ali, O. Siddiqui, S. Arman","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_71_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of ultrasonography (USG) to identify fascial layers has led to the development of several newer interfascial techniques for analgesia of the chest and abdominal wall. Two such modalities are the Pectoral nerve block (PEC) and Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) block. Objective: To compare the duration and quality of analgesia provided by ultrasound-guided SAP block with PEC block II in patients undergoing breast surgeries after induction of general anesthesia. Design: Randomized, double-blinded, prospective study. Methods: Sixty female patients were divided into two groups of 30 each. Patients in Group P received USG guided PEC II block, whereas patients in Group S received USG-guided SAP block after induction. Outcome Measure: The primary objective was to compare the duration of pain relief, whereas the secondary objectives were to compare the degree of pain relief, postoperative analgesic requirement within 24 h after the completion of the surgery, patient satisfaction score and complications if any. Results: The mean time of the first dose of analgesic given was 826 ± 405.24 min. in Group P and 1280 ± 264.29 min. in Group S (P < 0.001). The mean numeric rating scale score at rest at 6 h, on movement at 2 h and 6 h and satisfaction scores in Group P were significantly more than Group S. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided SAP block provides better postoperative analgesia both in quality and duration over PEC II block.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"36 1","pages":"37 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_71_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of ultrasonography (USG) to identify fascial layers has led to the development of several newer interfascial techniques for analgesia of the chest and abdominal wall. Two such modalities are the Pectoral nerve block (PEC) and Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) block. Objective: To compare the duration and quality of analgesia provided by ultrasound-guided SAP block with PEC block II in patients undergoing breast surgeries after induction of general anesthesia. Design: Randomized, double-blinded, prospective study. Methods: Sixty female patients were divided into two groups of 30 each. Patients in Group P received USG guided PEC II block, whereas patients in Group S received USG-guided SAP block after induction. Outcome Measure: The primary objective was to compare the duration of pain relief, whereas the secondary objectives were to compare the degree of pain relief, postoperative analgesic requirement within 24 h after the completion of the surgery, patient satisfaction score and complications if any. Results: The mean time of the first dose of analgesic given was 826 ± 405.24 min. in Group P and 1280 ± 264.29 min. in Group S (P < 0.001). The mean numeric rating scale score at rest at 6 h, on movement at 2 h and 6 h and satisfaction scores in Group P were significantly more than Group S. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided SAP block provides better postoperative analgesia both in quality and duration over PEC II block.
超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞与Ⅱ型胸神经阻滞在乳腺手术中的比较研究
背景:超声检查(USG)用于识别筋膜层,导致了几种新的用于胸腹壁镇痛的筋膜间技术的发展。两种这样的方式是胸神经阻滞(PEC)和Serratus前平面阻滞(SAP)。目的:比较超声引导下SAP阻滞和PEC II阻滞在全麻诱导下乳腺手术患者镇痛的持续时间和质量。设计:随机、双盲、前瞻性研究。方法:将60例女性患者分为两组,每组30例。P组患者接受USG引导的PEC II阻滞,而S组患者在诱导后接受USG指导的SAP阻滞。结果测量:主要目的是比较疼痛缓解的持续时间,而次要目标是比较疼痛减轻的程度、手术完成后24小时内的术后镇痛需求、患者满意度评分和并发症(如有)。结果:P组首次给药平均时间826±405.24 min,S组为1280±264.29 min(P<0.001),P组静息时、运动时和运动时的平均数值评定量表得分及满意度得分均显著高于S组。结论:超声引导下SAP阻滞在术后镇痛质量和持续时间上均优于PECⅡ阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信