Investigating the effect of Professional Ethics and Personal Moral Philosophy on Auditors' Fraud Detection Capability according to moderating role of Professional Skepticism

Mohammad Pashaei Fashtali, K. Hir, Mohamadreza Vatanparast
{"title":"Investigating the effect of Professional Ethics and Personal Moral Philosophy on Auditors' Fraud Detection Capability according to moderating role of Professional Skepticism","authors":"Mohammad Pashaei Fashtali, K. Hir, Mohamadreza Vatanparast","doi":"10.29252/AAPC.5.10.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Recent years studies show that external auditing occupies a low position (eighth place) among the methods of detecting fraud; as a result, it is important to examine which factors can improve external auditors' performance in detecting fraud. Therefore, the goal of this research is to study the effect of professional ethics and personal moral philosophy (subjective norm) and professional skepticism (attitude towards behavior) on external auditors' performance fraud detecting based on theory of planned behavior. This research is categorized as an applied one. Studying literature review, research data have been collected by a questionnaire. The statistical sample using cluster sampling method includes 159 private and public sector auditors and research period is dated during 2020. Data analyzing utilized by partial least squares (PLS) through Smart-PLS2 software. The results show that professional ethics and the ethical orientation of idealism have positive direct and indirect effect on the Fraud Detection Capability through mediator variable of professional skepticism. Moreover, ethical orientation of relativism has direct negative effect on fraud detecting","PeriodicalId":34790,"journal":{"name":"Hsbdry rzshy w rftry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hsbdry rzshy w rftry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/AAPC.5.10.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

: Recent years studies show that external auditing occupies a low position (eighth place) among the methods of detecting fraud; as a result, it is important to examine which factors can improve external auditors' performance in detecting fraud. Therefore, the goal of this research is to study the effect of professional ethics and personal moral philosophy (subjective norm) and professional skepticism (attitude towards behavior) on external auditors' performance fraud detecting based on theory of planned behavior. This research is categorized as an applied one. Studying literature review, research data have been collected by a questionnaire. The statistical sample using cluster sampling method includes 159 private and public sector auditors and research period is dated during 2020. Data analyzing utilized by partial least squares (PLS) through Smart-PLS2 software. The results show that professional ethics and the ethical orientation of idealism have positive direct and indirect effect on the Fraud Detection Capability through mediator variable of professional skepticism. Moreover, ethical orientation of relativism has direct negative effect on fraud detecting
从职业怀疑论的调节作用看职业道德和个人道德哲学对审计人员舞弊检测能力的影响
近年来的研究表明,外部审计在发现舞弊的方法中所占的地位较低(第八位);因此,重要的是检查哪些因素可以提高外部审计师在发现欺诈方面的表现。因此,本研究的目的是研究职业道德和个人道德哲学(主观规范)以及职业怀疑主义(行为态度)对基于计划行为理论的外部审计师绩效舞弊检测的影响。这项研究被归类为应用研究。研究文献综述,研究资料已通过问卷调查收集。采用整群抽样方法的统计样本包括159名私营和公共部门审计员,研究期限为2020年。通过Smart-PLS2软件进行偏最小二乘(PLS)数据分析。结果表明,职业道德和理想主义的伦理取向通过职业怀疑的中介变量对欺诈检测能力有直接和间接的正向影响。此外,相对主义的伦理取向对欺诈侦查有直接的负面影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信