Surprise after surprise – A preface of the editor

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Surprise after surprise – A preface of the editor","authors":"","doi":"10.1556/032.2021.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of the assembling this Special Issue in August 2021, the 11 of its kind, it is not yet clear whether the worldwide use of the designation COVID-19 is appropriate. There are some indications that the first cases of the new type of coronavirus may have occurred before 2019 and, more importantly, it is not known whether this deadly disease affects calendar years 2020 and 2021 or whether 2022 will be a pandemic year, too. All we know for sure is that when the WHO declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, no one thought that it would hit the economies of every country on Earth hard. The medical problem initially appeared to have only a public health dimension. There is a famous phrase in Marx’s Capital that all macroeconomists, regardless of their worldview, have always regarded as trivial: “Whatever the form of the process of production in a society, it must be a continuous process, must continue to go periodically through the same phases. A society can no more cease to produce than it can cease to consume. When viewed, therefore, as a connected whole, and as flowing on with incessant renewal, every social process of production is, at the same time, a process of reproduction.” That in peacetime the governments of most countries in the world would be willing to halt production by administrative fiat – that is, with the deliberate intention of reducing GDP and increasing unemployment – was utterly inconceivable.","PeriodicalId":45104,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oeconomica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the end of the assembling this Special Issue in August 2021, the 11 of its kind, it is not yet clear whether the worldwide use of the designation COVID-19 is appropriate. There are some indications that the first cases of the new type of coronavirus may have occurred before 2019 and, more importantly, it is not known whether this deadly disease affects calendar years 2020 and 2021 or whether 2022 will be a pandemic year, too. All we know for sure is that when the WHO declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, no one thought that it would hit the economies of every country on Earth hard. The medical problem initially appeared to have only a public health dimension. There is a famous phrase in Marx’s Capital that all macroeconomists, regardless of their worldview, have always regarded as trivial: “Whatever the form of the process of production in a society, it must be a continuous process, must continue to go periodically through the same phases. A society can no more cease to produce than it can cease to consume. When viewed, therefore, as a connected whole, and as flowing on with incessant renewal, every social process of production is, at the same time, a process of reproduction.” That in peacetime the governments of most countries in the world would be willing to halt production by administrative fiat – that is, with the deliberate intention of reducing GDP and increasing unemployment – was utterly inconceivable.
一个接一个的惊喜——编辑的序言
在2021年8月这期特刊的11期结束时,尚不清楚在全球范围内使用新冠肺炎这一名称是否合适。有一些迹象表明,新型冠状病毒的首批病例可能发生在2019年之前,更重要的是,目前尚不清楚这种致命疾病是否会影响2020和2021日历年,或者2022年是否也会成为大流行年。我们所知道的是,当世界卫生组织于2020年1月30日宣布疫情为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件时,没有人想到它会对地球上每个国家的经济造成沉重打击。医疗问题最初似乎只是公共卫生方面的问题。马克思的《资本论》中有一句名言:所有宏观经济学家,无论他们的世界观如何,一直认为微不足道:“无论一个社会的生产过程是什么形式,它都必须是一个连续的过程,必须继续周期性地经历相同的阶段。一个社会不能停止生产,也不能停止消费。因此,从一个相互联系的整体来看,每一个社会生产过程都是一个不断更新的过程。“在和平时期,世界上大多数国家的政府都愿意通过行政命令停止生产——也就是说,故意降低GDP和增加失业率——这是完全不可想象的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oeconomica
Acta Oeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Acta Oeconomica publishes articles on Eastern European and Hungarian economic transition, theoretical and general issues of the transition process, economic policy, econometrics and mathematical economics. Space is also devoted to international economics, European integration, labour economics, industrial organisation, finance and business economics.Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信