Framing Community Sponsorship in the context of the UK’s hostile environment

IF 2.3 2区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1177/02610183211023890

Gabriella D’avino

引用次数: 2

Abstract

The launch of the private sponsorship scheme, Community Sponsorship (CS), allowing individuals to resettle refugees in the UK, seems to be in contrast with the government’s approach towards immigration aimed to implement the hostile environment policy. Using frame analysis, this research looks at the diagnostic, prognostic and motivational framings used by policymakers in parliamentary debates related to CS to understand how the scheme and the hostile environment coexist. The findings show how the used frames allow the government to manage refugee resettlement more as a tool of migration management rather than exclusively as a tool of international protection, and how this strategy implements the UK’s hostile environment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在英国敌对环境的背景下构建社区赞助

私人赞助计划，社区赞助(CS)的推出，允许个人在英国重新安置难民，似乎与政府旨在实施敌对环境政策的移民方式形成鲜明对比。使用框架分析，本研究着眼于决策者在与CS相关的议会辩论中使用的诊断、预测和动机框架，以了解该计划与敌对环境如何共存。研究结果表明，所使用的框架如何使政府更多地将难民安置作为移民管理的工具，而不仅仅是作为国际保护的工具，以及这一策略如何实现英国的敌对环境。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Social Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

8.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;