Knowing your CJEF from your JEF: Europe’s “Alphabet soup” of interstitial military cooperation-what relevance for cold war 2.0?

Q1 Arts and Humanities
B. Flynn
{"title":"Knowing your CJEF from your JEF: Europe’s “Alphabet soup” of interstitial military cooperation-what relevance for cold war 2.0?","authors":"B. Flynn","doi":"10.1080/14702436.2022.2137495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines four of Europe’s more marginal military institutions that receive less attention: the Franco-British Combined Joint Expeditionary Force (CJEF); the French led European Intervention Initiative (EI2); the British led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF); and the Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian joint brigade (LITPOLUKRBRIG). These are described here as “interstitial” because they exist in the niches between both the main multilateral security forums (NATO, EU, UN, OSCE) and the national level. They are intermediaries, working like bridges to cover political obstacles, while often borrowing resources from established actors (notably NATO). It is argued here that such institutions are a form of national hedging against institutional blockages within NATO/EU while providing a platform for national defence policy entrepreneurship. In the context of Cold War 2.0 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, such institutional practices should not be dismissed as marginal. They offer a means to deploy European military forces outside formal NATO or EU decision-making structures, a feature which confers a useful flexibility. (161)","PeriodicalId":35155,"journal":{"name":"Defence Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"313 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2137495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines four of Europe’s more marginal military institutions that receive less attention: the Franco-British Combined Joint Expeditionary Force (CJEF); the French led European Intervention Initiative (EI2); the British led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF); and the Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian joint brigade (LITPOLUKRBRIG). These are described here as “interstitial” because they exist in the niches between both the main multilateral security forums (NATO, EU, UN, OSCE) and the national level. They are intermediaries, working like bridges to cover political obstacles, while often borrowing resources from established actors (notably NATO). It is argued here that such institutions are a form of national hedging against institutional blockages within NATO/EU while providing a platform for national defence policy entrepreneurship. In the context of Cold War 2.0 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, such institutional practices should not be dismissed as marginal. They offer a means to deploy European military forces outside formal NATO or EU decision-making structures, a feature which confers a useful flexibility. (161)
从你的JEF中了解你的CJEF:欧洲间隙军事合作的“字母汤”与冷战2.0有什么关系?
本文考察了欧洲四个鲜为人知的军事机构:法英联合远征军(CJEF);法国领导的欧洲干预倡议(EI2);英国领导的联合远征军(JEF);波兰、立陶宛和乌克兰联合旅(LITPOLUKRBRIG)。这里将其描述为“间隙性”,因为它们存在于主要多边安全论坛(北约、欧盟、联合国、欧安组织)和国家层面之间的缝隙中。他们是中间人,像桥梁一样跨越政治障碍,同时经常从老牌行动者(尤其是北约)那里借用资源。本文认为,这些机构是北约/欧盟内部针对体制障碍的一种国家对冲形式,同时为国防政策创业提供了一个平台。在冷战2.0和俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的背景下,这种制度性做法不应被视为无足轻重。它们提供了一种在北约或欧盟正式决策结构之外部署欧洲军事力量的手段,这一特点赋予了一种有用的灵活性。(161)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Defence Studies
Defence Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信