Does real interest rate parity really work? Historical evidence from a discrete wavelet perspective

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Mahdi Ghaemi Asl, G. Canarella, S. Miller, Hamid Reza Tavakkoli
{"title":"Does real interest rate parity really work? Historical evidence from a discrete wavelet perspective","authors":"Mahdi Ghaemi Asl, G. Canarella, S. Miller, Hamid Reza Tavakkoli","doi":"10.1515/snde-2021-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We test for real interest rate parity using data from six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom), Japan, and the United States over a period of more than two centuries. Our contribution is threefold. First, we implement a wavelet-based analysis, which examines both frequency and time information contained in a time series. Second, we employ the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany as alternative base countries in the wavelet regressions to ascertain the sensitivity of the results to the choice of the base country. Third, we test the real interest rate parity over the entire period (1800–2018) and for several non-contiguous subperiods that hold historical significance and relative importance. Three subperiods link to the three globalization waves (1870–1914, 1944–1971, and 1989–2018), and four subperiods connect to the exchange rate regimes. The wavelet-based results suggest that the validity of the real interest rate parity is scale-dependent. The specific evidence in most cases supports the parity at lower frequencies but not at higher frequencies, which is consistent with the idea that the purchasing power parity and uncovered interest parity, the two main ingredients of the real interest rate parity, are mostly valid in the long run.","PeriodicalId":46709,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2021-0067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We test for real interest rate parity using data from six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom), Japan, and the United States over a period of more than two centuries. Our contribution is threefold. First, we implement a wavelet-based analysis, which examines both frequency and time information contained in a time series. Second, we employ the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany as alternative base countries in the wavelet regressions to ascertain the sensitivity of the results to the choice of the base country. Third, we test the real interest rate parity over the entire period (1800–2018) and for several non-contiguous subperiods that hold historical significance and relative importance. Three subperiods link to the three globalization waves (1870–1914, 1944–1971, and 1989–2018), and four subperiods connect to the exchange rate regimes. The wavelet-based results suggest that the validity of the real interest rate parity is scale-dependent. The specific evidence in most cases supports the parity at lower frequencies but not at higher frequencies, which is consistent with the idea that the purchasing power parity and uncovered interest parity, the two main ingredients of the real interest rate parity, are mostly valid in the long run.
实际利率平价真的有效吗?离散小波视角下的历史证据
摘要我们使用六个欧洲国家(法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、西班牙和英国)、日本和美国在两个多世纪的数据来测试实际利率平价。我们的贡献有三方面。首先,我们实现了基于小波的分析,它检查时间序列中包含的频率和时间信息。其次,我们在小波回归中使用美国、英国和德国作为替代基准国,以确定结果对基准国选择的敏感性。第三,我们测试了整个时期(1800–2018)以及具有历史意义和相对重要性的几个非连续子时期的实际利率平价。三个子周期与三次全球化浪潮(1870–1914、1944–1971和1989–2018)有关,四个子周期与汇率制度有关。基于小波的结果表明,实际利率平价的有效性与规模有关。在大多数情况下,具体证据支持低频率平价,但不支持高频率平价,这与购买力平价和未覆盖利率平价这两个实际利率平价的主要组成部分从长远来看大多有效的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics (SNDE) recognizes that advances in statistics and dynamical systems theory may increase our understanding of economic and financial markets. The journal seeks both theoretical and applied papers that characterize and motivate nonlinear phenomena. Researchers are required to assist replication of empirical results by providing copies of data and programs online. Algorithms and rapid communications are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信