Applying for Social Housing in Australia – The Centrality of Cultural, Social and Emotional Capital

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
A. Morris, Andrew Clarke, C. Robinson, Jan Idle, Cameron Parsell
{"title":"Applying for Social Housing in Australia – The Centrality of Cultural, Social and Emotional Capital","authors":"A. Morris, Andrew Clarke, C. Robinson, Jan Idle, Cameron Parsell","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2022.2085169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social housing scarcity has underpinned the development of detailed social housing application processes across Australia. Applications require the strongest possible evidence of disadvantage and need, conceptualized in this paper as the required demonstration of “inverse distinction”. Drawing on 47 in-depth interviews in three Australian states with people who have expert knowledge of the application process, we argue that the onerous requirements of the application means that if an applicant does not have a skilled supporter or advocate, they are less likely to achieve an optimal result. Drawing on Bourdieu’s framework and the concept of emotional capital, we demonstrate that being prioritized invariably involves an applicant sub-contracting cultural and social capital to an advocate. Further, the latter needs to have the requisite emotional capital. This article shines new light on the practical and emotional workload of social housing applications for both housing professionals and those in need of housing assistance.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"42 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory & Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2022.2085169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social housing scarcity has underpinned the development of detailed social housing application processes across Australia. Applications require the strongest possible evidence of disadvantage and need, conceptualized in this paper as the required demonstration of “inverse distinction”. Drawing on 47 in-depth interviews in three Australian states with people who have expert knowledge of the application process, we argue that the onerous requirements of the application means that if an applicant does not have a skilled supporter or advocate, they are less likely to achieve an optimal result. Drawing on Bourdieu’s framework and the concept of emotional capital, we demonstrate that being prioritized invariably involves an applicant sub-contracting cultural and social capital to an advocate. Further, the latter needs to have the requisite emotional capital. This article shines new light on the practical and emotional workload of social housing applications for both housing professionals and those in need of housing assistance.
在澳大利亚申请社会住房——文化、社会和情感资本的中心地位
社会住房的稀缺已经支撑了整个澳大利亚详细的社会住房申请流程的发展。应用程序需要最强有力的劣势和需求证据,本文将其定义为“反向区分”的必要证明。通过对澳大利亚三个州的47位对申请流程有专业知识的人的深入访谈,我们认为申请的繁重要求意味着如果申请人没有熟练的支持者或倡导者,他们就不太可能取得最佳结果。利用布迪厄的框架和情感资本的概念,我们证明了优先考虑总是涉及申请人将文化和社会资本分包给倡导者。此外,后者需要拥有必要的情感资本。这篇文章为房屋专业人士和需要房屋援助的人士在申请社会房屋时的实际和情感工作量提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信