Comparative analysis of the impact of piracy on International Trade in Korea, Indonesia and Nigeria

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
K. Anele
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the impact of piracy on International Trade in Korea, Indonesia and Nigeria","authors":"K. Anele","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2117476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n International trade is crucial to the economic development of states and shipping is pivotal in this transaction. The efficiency of international trade requires secured sea lanes for vessels conveying cargo to traverse from one country to another. These activities are particularly significant to the economies of riparian states. However, piracy adversely implicates these activities. This paper uses a comparative methodology to analyse international trade and piracy in Korea, Indonesia and Nigeria, and argues that though these countries have criminalized piracy, Korea has effectively implemented its antipiracy legislation in the prosecution of pirates in Korean courts. Moreover, unlike Indonesia and Nigeria, Korea has, inter alia, regularly strengthened its piracy institutional regime and entrenched democracy in its governance. Thus, unlike Indonesia and Nigeria, piracy affects Korea through attacks on Korea vessels on international sea lanes, Korean seafarers in foreign-owned vessels and Korean-bound vessels. The paper, therefore, suggests that Indonesia and Nigeria should adopt Korea’s counterpiracy initiatives to curb the spate of piratical attacks off the Indonesian and Nigerian waters.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"12 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2117476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT International trade is crucial to the economic development of states and shipping is pivotal in this transaction. The efficiency of international trade requires secured sea lanes for vessels conveying cargo to traverse from one country to another. These activities are particularly significant to the economies of riparian states. However, piracy adversely implicates these activities. This paper uses a comparative methodology to analyse international trade and piracy in Korea, Indonesia and Nigeria, and argues that though these countries have criminalized piracy, Korea has effectively implemented its antipiracy legislation in the prosecution of pirates in Korean courts. Moreover, unlike Indonesia and Nigeria, Korea has, inter alia, regularly strengthened its piracy institutional regime and entrenched democracy in its governance. Thus, unlike Indonesia and Nigeria, piracy affects Korea through attacks on Korea vessels on international sea lanes, Korean seafarers in foreign-owned vessels and Korean-bound vessels. The paper, therefore, suggests that Indonesia and Nigeria should adopt Korea’s counterpiracy initiatives to curb the spate of piratical attacks off the Indonesian and Nigerian waters.
海盗行为对韩国、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚国际贸易影响的比较分析
摘要国际贸易对各国经济发展至关重要,航运在这一交易中起着关键作用。为了提高国际贸易的效率,运输货物的船只需要有安全的海上通道才能从一个国家穿越到另一个国家。这些活动对沿岸国家的经济尤其重要。然而,海盗活动对这些活动产生了不利影响。本文采用比较方法分析了韩国、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚的国际贸易和海盗行为,并认为尽管这些国家已将海盗行为定为刑事犯罪,但韩国在韩国法院起诉海盗时有效地实施了反海盗立法。此外,与印度尼西亚和尼日利亚不同,韩国定期加强其海盗制度,并在治理中巩固民主。因此,与印度尼西亚和尼日利亚不同,海盗行为通过袭击国际海上航线上的韩国船只、外国船只上的韩国海员和前往韩国的船只来影响韩国。因此,该文件建议印尼和尼日利亚采取韩国的反海盗举措,以遏制印尼和尼日利亚海域发生的一连串海盗袭击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信