Telehealth Acceptance among Appalachian Respondents During COVID 19: A Secondary Data Analysis

Victoria Hood-Wells, F. Weierbach, A. Wahlquist, Janet Keener, Manik Ahuja, H. Mamudu
{"title":"Telehealth Acceptance among Appalachian Respondents During COVID 19: A Secondary Data Analysis","authors":"Victoria Hood-Wells, F. Weierbach, A. Wahlquist, Janet Keener, Manik Ahuja, H. Mamudu","doi":"10.14574/ojrnhc.v22i2.715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between telehealth use, telehealth satisfaction, and chronic medical conditions among residents living in Appalachian and non-Appalachian communities. Sample: A COVID-19 public health survey was distributed via social media and healthcare clinics in the tri-state region of central Appalachia. Survey responses were limited to adults aged ≥18 years who consented to participate in the survey that self-identified as an individual with one or more chronic medical conditions (n=195). Method: Simple descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for variables of interest both overall and by subgroups of interest. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical outcomes between groups of interest, while two-sample t-tests were used for continuous outcomes. Significance for all tests was determined using an α level of 0.05. Findings: There is no statistically significant relationship between respondents with regard to using telehealth services, satisfaction rates related to telehealth use, or reasons for electing not to use telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a trending statistical relationship between county status and the use of telehealth services in Appalachia with those counties doing economically better being more likely to use telehealth services as compared to those fairing less well (p=0.053). Findings also suggest that people living in urban areas of Appalachia were more likely to be satisfied using telehealth services than those living in non-urban areas of Appalachia (p=0.01). Conclusions: Research is still limited as to how the expansion of broadband capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has benefited those residing in Appalachia in terms of managing chronic","PeriodicalId":56353,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v22i2.715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between telehealth use, telehealth satisfaction, and chronic medical conditions among residents living in Appalachian and non-Appalachian communities. Sample: A COVID-19 public health survey was distributed via social media and healthcare clinics in the tri-state region of central Appalachia. Survey responses were limited to adults aged ≥18 years who consented to participate in the survey that self-identified as an individual with one or more chronic medical conditions (n=195). Method: Simple descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for variables of interest both overall and by subgroups of interest. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical outcomes between groups of interest, while two-sample t-tests were used for continuous outcomes. Significance for all tests was determined using an α level of 0.05. Findings: There is no statistically significant relationship between respondents with regard to using telehealth services, satisfaction rates related to telehealth use, or reasons for electing not to use telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a trending statistical relationship between county status and the use of telehealth services in Appalachia with those counties doing economically better being more likely to use telehealth services as compared to those fairing less well (p=0.053). Findings also suggest that people living in urban areas of Appalachia were more likely to be satisfied using telehealth services than those living in non-urban areas of Appalachia (p=0.01). Conclusions: Research is still limited as to how the expansion of broadband capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has benefited those residing in Appalachia in terms of managing chronic
COVID - 19期间阿巴拉契亚受访者对远程医疗的接受程度:辅助数据分析
目的:本研究的目的是探讨居住在阿巴拉契亚和非阿巴拉契亚社区的居民远程医疗使用、远程医疗满意度和慢性医疗状况之间的关系。样本:在阿巴拉契亚中部三州地区通过社交媒体和医疗保健诊所分发了一项COVID-19公共卫生调查。调查回复仅限于年龄≥18岁、同意参加调查且自我认定为患有一种或多种慢性疾病的成年人(n=195)。方法:简单的描述性统计,包括频率、百分比、平均值和标准差(SDs),对总体和亚组感兴趣的变量进行计算。卡方检验用于比较各组之间的分类结果,而双样本t检验用于连续结果。采用0.05的α水平确定所有检验的显著性。调查结果:在COVID-19大流行期间,受访者在使用远程医疗服务、与远程医疗使用相关的满意率或选择不使用远程医疗服务的原因方面没有统计学上的显著关系。然而,在阿巴拉契亚地区,县地位与远程医疗服务的使用之间存在趋势统计关系,与那些经济状况较差的县相比,那些经济状况较好的县更有可能使用远程医疗服务(p=0.053)。研究结果还表明,生活在阿巴拉契亚城市地区的人比生活在阿巴拉契亚非城市地区的人更有可能对使用远程医疗服务感到满意(p=0.01)。结论:关于COVID-19大流行期间宽带能力的扩展如何使阿巴拉契亚地区的居民在管理慢性疾病方面受益的研究仍然有限
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Research articles concerning rural nursing and/or rural health-care are invited for review. Theoretical, opinion and evidence-based reviews are also invited for review. Letters to the Editor encouraged under column section. At least one author on each manuscript must be a member of the Rural Nurse Organization (RNO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信