A Scoping Review Protocol to Map Empirical Evidence that Illuminates the Dark Side of Occupations Among Adults

Rebecca Twinley, Leonie Boland, L. Bunn, Gayle Letherby
{"title":"A Scoping Review Protocol to Map Empirical Evidence that Illuminates the Dark Side of Occupations Among Adults","authors":"Rebecca Twinley, Leonie Boland, L. Bunn, Gayle Letherby","doi":"10.7565/ssp.2020.2807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this review is to explore existing literature to identify, map, and synthesise past accounts of occupations that could be considered as constituting the dark side of occupation and which could, consequently, be identified and discussed as such. Presenting findings through use of a synthesis matrix, and formulating a descriptive account of the types of occupations (including their form, function, meaning, and contribution to identity and becoming) that constitute the dark side of occupation, is anticipated to assist with prioritising future collaborative research endeavours, as part of an intended programme of research. \nSpecifically, the review questions are: \n \nWhat past accounts of occupations have been discussed or explored in the literature that would constitute falling under the conceptual ‘umbrella’ of the dark side of occupation? \nWhat specific occupations that challenge the pervasive belief in the link between health and occupation have been discussed for the adult population, across all cultures? \nWhere do gaps of knowledge remain regarding the less explored occupations people subjectively experience, and which indicate the priority research areas that need to be explored from an occupational perspective? \n","PeriodicalId":74825,"journal":{"name":"Social science protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/ssp.2020.2807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this review is to explore existing literature to identify, map, and synthesise past accounts of occupations that could be considered as constituting the dark side of occupation and which could, consequently, be identified and discussed as such. Presenting findings through use of a synthesis matrix, and formulating a descriptive account of the types of occupations (including their form, function, meaning, and contribution to identity and becoming) that constitute the dark side of occupation, is anticipated to assist with prioritising future collaborative research endeavours, as part of an intended programme of research. Specifically, the review questions are: What past accounts of occupations have been discussed or explored in the literature that would constitute falling under the conceptual ‘umbrella’ of the dark side of occupation? What specific occupations that challenge the pervasive belief in the link between health and occupation have been discussed for the adult population, across all cultures? Where do gaps of knowledge remain regarding the less explored occupations people subjectively experience, and which indicate the priority research areas that need to be explored from an occupational perspective?
一项范围审查协议,以绘制经验证据,阐明成人职业的阴暗面
本综述的目的是探索现有文献,以识别、绘制和综合过去对职业的描述,这些职业可以被认为构成职业的黑暗面,因此可以被识别和讨论。通过使用综合矩阵来呈现研究结果,并对构成职业黑暗面的职业类型(包括其形式、功能、意义以及对身份和发展的贡献)进行描述性描述,预计将有助于确定未来合作研究工作的优先次序,作为预期研究计划的一部分。具体来说,回顾问题是:在过去的文献中讨论或探索了哪些职业的描述,这些描述将构成职业黑暗面概念的“保护伞”?对于所有文化的成年人来说,有哪些具体的职业挑战了健康与职业之间联系的普遍信念?关于人们主观经历的较少探索的职业,知识差距在哪里?哪些表明需要从职业角度探索的优先研究领域?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信