AN ASSESSMENT OF POINT CLOUD DATA ACQUISITION TECHNIQUES FOR AGGREGATE STOCKPILES AND VOLUMETRIC SURVEYS

Q2 Social Sciences
D. J. A. Davis, N. S. Guy
{"title":"AN ASSESSMENT OF POINT CLOUD DATA ACQUISITION TECHNIQUES FOR AGGREGATE STOCKPILES AND VOLUMETRIC SURVEYS","authors":"D. J. A. Davis, N. S. Guy","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-3-2023-65-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Stockpiling aggregate materials is a common practice within the construction industry and with the demand for aggregates rapidly increasing, stockpile owners have taken a greater interest in the effective determination of volumes of inventory to optimize profit and limit waste. Historically, traditional stockpile measurement techniques were inaccurate but with the increase in demand, a higher quality and more reliable assessment of resources is necessary.The evolution of point cloud measurement and mapping technology, such as UAV and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), now means these techniques can be utilized for stockpile measurements. While some of the advantages over traditional techniques have been well documented, there is still a need to ascertain which of these methods is more applicable for volumetric surveys of different types of aggregate stockpiles.This study involved data collection and analysis from TLS and UAV photogrammetry for volumetric surveys and comparisons with Total Station (TS) measurement of the stockpiles for sharp sand, coarse (gravel) and finer aggregates.The research suggested that TS surveys could only be effectively utilized on sharp sand and coarse aggregates and was impractical for finer aggregates, and their results produced a general under-reporting of stockpile volumes. TLS and UAV provide non-contact collection with increased accuracy. There are differences in accuracy and appropriateness dependent on the aggregate type. It was observed that the TLS outperformed the TS approach whereas UAV demonstrated promise particularly at a lower altitude with greater overlap.Additional recommendations are shared to potentially improve productivity and inventory maintenance for Stockpiling Operations.\n","PeriodicalId":30634,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-3-2023-65-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Stockpiling aggregate materials is a common practice within the construction industry and with the demand for aggregates rapidly increasing, stockpile owners have taken a greater interest in the effective determination of volumes of inventory to optimize profit and limit waste. Historically, traditional stockpile measurement techniques were inaccurate but with the increase in demand, a higher quality and more reliable assessment of resources is necessary.The evolution of point cloud measurement and mapping technology, such as UAV and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), now means these techniques can be utilized for stockpile measurements. While some of the advantages over traditional techniques have been well documented, there is still a need to ascertain which of these methods is more applicable for volumetric surveys of different types of aggregate stockpiles.This study involved data collection and analysis from TLS and UAV photogrammetry for volumetric surveys and comparisons with Total Station (TS) measurement of the stockpiles for sharp sand, coarse (gravel) and finer aggregates.The research suggested that TS surveys could only be effectively utilized on sharp sand and coarse aggregates and was impractical for finer aggregates, and their results produced a general under-reporting of stockpile volumes. TLS and UAV provide non-contact collection with increased accuracy. There are differences in accuracy and appropriateness dependent on the aggregate type. It was observed that the TLS outperformed the TS approach whereas UAV demonstrated promise particularly at a lower altitude with greater overlap.Additional recommendations are shared to potentially improve productivity and inventory maintenance for Stockpiling Operations.
对总库存和体积调查的点云数据采集技术的评估
摘要储存骨料是建筑行业的一种常见做法,随着对骨料的需求迅速增加,库存所有者对有效确定库存量以优化利润和限制浪费越来越感兴趣。从历史上看,传统的库存测量技术是不准确的,但随着需求的增加,有必要对资源进行更高质量和更可靠的评估。点云测量和绘图技术的发展,如无人机和地面激光扫描(TLS),现在意味着这些技术可以用于库存测量。尽管与传统技术相比的一些优势已经得到了充分的证明,但仍有必要确定这些方法中的哪一种更适用于不同类型骨料库存的体积调查。本研究涉及TLS和无人机摄影测量的数据收集和分析,用于体积测量,并与全站仪(TS)对尖砂、粗骨料(砾石)和细骨料料堆的测量进行比较。研究表明,TS调查只能有效地用于锋利的沙子和粗骨料,而对于较细的骨料是不切实际的,其结果导致库存量普遍报告不足。TLS和UAV提供非接触式采集,精度更高。准确性和适当性因骨料类型而异。据观察,TLS的性能优于TS方法,而无人机表现出了良好的前景,尤其是在重叠较大的较低高度。还提出了其他建议,有可能提高储存行动的生产力和库存维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
949
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信