Effectiveness and feasibility of early essential newborn care during term cesarean section

Q4 Medicine
Jianping Xu, Shuiqin Gu, Qun'e Zhu, X. Cui, Min Zhang, Lianbu Wan, Kaini Lu
{"title":"Effectiveness and feasibility of early essential newborn care during term cesarean section","authors":"Jianping Xu, Shuiqin Gu, Qun'e Zhu, X. Cui, Min Zhang, Lianbu Wan, Kaini Lu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2019.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the effects of early essential newborn care (EENC) on short-term maternal and neonatal health and to evaluate the satisfaction and acceptability of both patients and medical staff in the operating room regarding the implementation of EENC during term cesarean section(CS). \n \n \nMethods \nTwo hundred gravidas who underwent CS in Wenzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children Hospital from January 2018 to April 2018 were recruited in this prospective study. According to the odd or even number of their medical records, these women were randomly divided into EENC or control group, 100 in each. EENC was offered to those in the EENC group immediately after birth, including drying the newborn immediately and thoroughly, mother–infant skin-to-skin contact at least 90 min and initiating the first breastfeeding, and delayed cord clamping until l-3 min after birth. Routine neonatal care was provided to the control group, including regular drying, insufficient skin-to-skin contact and cord clamping within 1 min after birth. Differences were compared between the two groups in the incidence of abnormal pulse, low oxygen saturation, hypothermia and mild asphyxia from the neonatal aspect and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and early initiation of breastfeeding from the maternal aspect. The acceptability and satisfaction of all the participants and the medical staff were also analyzed. t-test and Chi-square test were used as statistical methods. \n \n \nResults \nAll of the 200 participants were finally analyzed. In the EENC group, the incidence of neonatal hypothermia [2% (2/100) vs 13% (13/100), χ2=8.721, P=0.003] and maternal postpartum hemorrhage [1% (1/100) vs 6% (6/100), χ2=5.701, P=0.035] were lower comparing to the control group, while the initiation rate of early breastfeeding was higher [56% (56/100) vs 5% (5/100), χ2=61.352, P 0.05). The scores of maternal satisfaction (24.6±0.4 vs 23.4±1.9, t=6.443, P=0.001) and acceptability (24.3±0.5 vs 23.5±1.4, t=5.436, P=0.001) in the EENC group were also significantly higher than those in the control. For the obstetric operation team, the acceptability scores among obstetricians (22.6±0.8 vs 21.6±1.3, t=2.379, P=0.019), instrument nurses (23.2±0.9 vs 21.3±1.1, t=13.592, P<0.001) and anesthetists (22.6±0.9 vs 21.5±1.7, t=5.625, P=0.001) in the EENC group were higher than those in the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in the acceptability among rounding nurses between the two groups (P=0.086). \n \n \nConclusions \nEENC during CS could stabilize the neonatal temperature, reduce postpartum hemorrhage, promote early breastfeeding and improve the maternal satisfaction as well as the acceptability of both obstetric operation team and puerperae. There is a clinical significance to promote EENC during CS. \n \n \nKey words: \nCesarean section; Maternal-child nursing; Neonatal nursing; Feasibility studies","PeriodicalId":52320,"journal":{"name":"中华围产医学杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"570-574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华围产医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2019.08.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of early essential newborn care (EENC) on short-term maternal and neonatal health and to evaluate the satisfaction and acceptability of both patients and medical staff in the operating room regarding the implementation of EENC during term cesarean section(CS). Methods Two hundred gravidas who underwent CS in Wenzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children Hospital from January 2018 to April 2018 were recruited in this prospective study. According to the odd or even number of their medical records, these women were randomly divided into EENC or control group, 100 in each. EENC was offered to those in the EENC group immediately after birth, including drying the newborn immediately and thoroughly, mother–infant skin-to-skin contact at least 90 min and initiating the first breastfeeding, and delayed cord clamping until l-3 min after birth. Routine neonatal care was provided to the control group, including regular drying, insufficient skin-to-skin contact and cord clamping within 1 min after birth. Differences were compared between the two groups in the incidence of abnormal pulse, low oxygen saturation, hypothermia and mild asphyxia from the neonatal aspect and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and early initiation of breastfeeding from the maternal aspect. The acceptability and satisfaction of all the participants and the medical staff were also analyzed. t-test and Chi-square test were used as statistical methods. Results All of the 200 participants were finally analyzed. In the EENC group, the incidence of neonatal hypothermia [2% (2/100) vs 13% (13/100), χ2=8.721, P=0.003] and maternal postpartum hemorrhage [1% (1/100) vs 6% (6/100), χ2=5.701, P=0.035] were lower comparing to the control group, while the initiation rate of early breastfeeding was higher [56% (56/100) vs 5% (5/100), χ2=61.352, P 0.05). The scores of maternal satisfaction (24.6±0.4 vs 23.4±1.9, t=6.443, P=0.001) and acceptability (24.3±0.5 vs 23.5±1.4, t=5.436, P=0.001) in the EENC group were also significantly higher than those in the control. For the obstetric operation team, the acceptability scores among obstetricians (22.6±0.8 vs 21.6±1.3, t=2.379, P=0.019), instrument nurses (23.2±0.9 vs 21.3±1.1, t=13.592, P<0.001) and anesthetists (22.6±0.9 vs 21.5±1.7, t=5.625, P=0.001) in the EENC group were higher than those in the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in the acceptability among rounding nurses between the two groups (P=0.086). Conclusions EENC during CS could stabilize the neonatal temperature, reduce postpartum hemorrhage, promote early breastfeeding and improve the maternal satisfaction as well as the acceptability of both obstetric operation team and puerperae. There is a clinical significance to promote EENC during CS. Key words: Cesarean section; Maternal-child nursing; Neonatal nursing; Feasibility studies
足月剖宫产早期新生儿基本护理的有效性和可行性
目的探讨早期新生儿基本护理(EENC)对产妇和新生儿短期健康的影响,评价患者和手术室医护人员对足月剖宫产术(CS)实施新生儿早期基本护理(EENC)的满意度和接受程度。方法2018年1月至2018年4月在温州医科大学附属妇幼医院行CS的孕妇200例为前瞻性研究对象。根据她们的医疗记录的奇数或偶数,这些妇女被随机分为EENC组和对照组,每组100人。EENC组在出生后立即给予EENC,包括立即彻底擦干新生儿,母婴皮肤接触至少90分钟并开始第一次母乳喂养,延迟脐带夹紧至出生后1 -3分钟。对照组给予常规新生儿护理,包括定期晾晒、皮肤接触不足、出生后1分钟内夹脐带。比较两组新生儿方面脉搏异常、低血氧饱和度、体温过低、轻度窒息发生率的差异,以及产妇方面产后出血、早期开始母乳喂养发生率的差异。分析了所有参与者和医务人员的接受度和满意度。统计学方法采用t检验和卡方检验。结果最终对200名参与者进行了分析。EENC组新生儿低体温发生率[2% (2/100)vs 13% (13/100), χ2=8.721, P=0.003]和产妇产后出血发生率[1% (1/100)vs 6% (6/100), χ2=5.701, P=0.035]低于对照组,而早期母乳喂养起始率[56% (56/100)vs 5% (5/100), χ2=61.352, P 0.05]高于对照组。EENC组产妇满意度评分(24.6±0.4比23.4±1.9,t=6.443, P=0.001)和可接受性评分(24.3±0.5比23.5±1.4,t=5.436, P=0.001)均显著高于对照组。产科手术组产科医师(22.6±0.8比21.6±1.3,t=2.379, P=0.019)、器械护士(23.2±0.9比21.3±1.1,t=13.592, P<0.001)、麻醉师(22.6±0.9比21.5±1.7,t=5.625, P=0.001)的可接受性评分均高于对照组。然而,两组护士的可接受性差异无统计学意义(P=0.086)。结论围产术中EENC能稳定新生儿体温,减少产后出血,促进早期母乳喂养,提高产妇满意度和产褥组及产妇的可接受性。CS术中促进EENC有临床意义。关键词:剖宫产术;妇幼护理;新生儿护理;可行性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华围产医学杂志
中华围产医学杂志 Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4446
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine was founded in May 1998. It is one of the journals of the Chinese Medical Association, which is supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association, and hosted by Peking University First Hospital. Perinatal medicine is a new discipline jointly studied by obstetrics and neonatology. The purpose of this journal is to "prenatal and postnatal care, improve the quality of the newborn population, and ensure the safety and health of mothers and infants". It reflects the new theories, new technologies, and new progress in perinatal medicine in related disciplines such as basic, clinical and preventive medicine, genetics, and sociology. It aims to provide a window and platform for academic exchanges, information transmission, and understanding of the development trends of domestic and foreign perinatal medicine for the majority of perinatal medicine workers in my country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信