Contingency, Opacity, Belief: Ethics in The Wings of the Dove

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Maisie Wiltshire-Gordon
{"title":"Contingency, Opacity, Belief: Ethics in The Wings of the Dove","authors":"Maisie Wiltshire-Gordon","doi":"10.1353/hjr.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Wings of the Dove brings out a fierce desire to know—a desire the text often refuses to satisfy. I argue that this denial of knowledge acts ethically: drawing on unexpected common ground between Davidson and Levinas, I see knowledge-formation as fitting new information into existing schema. Wings marks the inadequacy of those schema, instead proposing a particularized, contingent encounter with characters who escape our grasp. Crucially, this is not an ethics grounded only in denial: even as James forecloses access to characters' consciousness, his stylistic choices attest to their inner lives as unavailable yet not empty.","PeriodicalId":43156,"journal":{"name":"HENRY JAMES REVIEW","volume":"44 1","pages":"133 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HENRY JAMES REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2023.0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The Wings of the Dove brings out a fierce desire to know—a desire the text often refuses to satisfy. I argue that this denial of knowledge acts ethically: drawing on unexpected common ground between Davidson and Levinas, I see knowledge-formation as fitting new information into existing schema. Wings marks the inadequacy of those schema, instead proposing a particularized, contingent encounter with characters who escape our grasp. Crucially, this is not an ethics grounded only in denial: even as James forecloses access to characters' consciousness, his stylistic choices attest to their inner lives as unavailable yet not empty.
偶然性、不透明性、信仰:《鸽子之翼》中的伦理
摘要:《鸽子之翼》激起了一种强烈的求知欲,而这种求知欲是文本常常无法满足的。我认为这种对知识的否定是合乎道德的:借鉴戴维森和列维纳斯之间意想不到的共同点,我认为知识的形成是将新信息融入现有的图式。《翅膀》标志着这些图式的不足,相反,它提出了一种与我们无法掌握的人物的特殊的、偶然的相遇。至关重要的是,这并不是一种仅仅以否认为基础的伦理:即使詹姆斯禁止进入人物的意识,他的风格选择也证明了他们的内心生活是不可获得的,但并非空虚的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HENRY JAMES REVIEW
HENRY JAMES REVIEW LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书