Wheelchair User’s Satisfaction and its Impact on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in People with Spinal Cord Injury

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Beenish Mehmood, Iftikhar Ali, Syeda Afsheen Hasnain Daud, S. Ilyas
{"title":"Wheelchair User’s Satisfaction and its Impact on Physical\n Activity and Quality of Life in People with Spinal Cord Injury","authors":"Beenish Mehmood, Iftikhar Ali, Syeda Afsheen Hasnain Daud, S. Ilyas","doi":"10.1055/a-1870-3090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) survivors rely greatly on assistive\n devices, spending around 9–11 hours daily in a wheelchair. It\n can act both as a barrier and facilitator, positively impacting their mobility,\n community participation, quality of life (QOL) and functional independence\n provided the device is satisfactory. However, there is a paucity of information\n on the level of user satisfication and its impact on the mobility and well\n being. Keeping in view the present study was conducted to determine the level of\n wheelchair user’s satisfaction and its impact on physical activity and\n QOL in SCI.\n Methods A cross sectional study with a sample of 130 was conducted at\n Paraplegic Center, Peshawar using “Quebec User Evaluation of\n Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST)” for wheelchair\n user’s satisfaction, “Physical Activity Scale for Individuals\n with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) for physical activity and World Health\n Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) for QOL.\n Results Mean age of the study participants was 32.48±11.96 years.\n The majority of the participants were males, with most of them being manual\n wheelchair users. Nearly 80% were regular users. The calculated mean for\n the QUEST was 3.23±0.51 while 24.49±27.66 for the PASIPD. For\n the WHOQOL-BREF the calculated median (IQR) in the environmental 56.00 (19.00)\n and psychological 56.00 (12.00) domain was highest followed by physical domain\n 50.00(19.00). No significant correlation between participant’s\n satisfaction level (for wheelchair), and PASIPD (rs=0.054,\n p=0.541) was observed. On the other hand significant positive\n correlation was found between physical (rs=0.394,\n p<0.001), social (rs=0.303, p<0.001) and\n environmental domain (rs=0.425, p<0.001) except\n psychological domain (rs=0.156, p=0.076) of QOL.\n Conclusion The majority of the participants showed moderate levels of\n satisfication and the impact was observed on the physical, social and\n environmental domains of QOL. Appropriate wheelchairs enhancing the QOL\n therefore special measures should be taken to customize the device to the body\n structure and needs of the customers as anything that can improve their lives\n even to a minor extent can prove very helpful.","PeriodicalId":54611,"journal":{"name":"Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1870-3090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) survivors rely greatly on assistive devices, spending around 9–11 hours daily in a wheelchair. It can act both as a barrier and facilitator, positively impacting their mobility, community participation, quality of life (QOL) and functional independence provided the device is satisfactory. However, there is a paucity of information on the level of user satisfication and its impact on the mobility and well being. Keeping in view the present study was conducted to determine the level of wheelchair user’s satisfaction and its impact on physical activity and QOL in SCI. Methods A cross sectional study with a sample of 130 was conducted at Paraplegic Center, Peshawar using “Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST)” for wheelchair user’s satisfaction, “Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) for physical activity and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) for QOL. Results Mean age of the study participants was 32.48±11.96 years. The majority of the participants were males, with most of them being manual wheelchair users. Nearly 80% were regular users. The calculated mean for the QUEST was 3.23±0.51 while 24.49±27.66 for the PASIPD. For the WHOQOL-BREF the calculated median (IQR) in the environmental 56.00 (19.00) and psychological 56.00 (12.00) domain was highest followed by physical domain 50.00(19.00). No significant correlation between participant’s satisfaction level (for wheelchair), and PASIPD (rs=0.054, p=0.541) was observed. On the other hand significant positive correlation was found between physical (rs=0.394, p<0.001), social (rs=0.303, p<0.001) and environmental domain (rs=0.425, p<0.001) except psychological domain (rs=0.156, p=0.076) of QOL. Conclusion The majority of the participants showed moderate levels of satisfication and the impact was observed on the physical, social and environmental domains of QOL. Appropriate wheelchairs enhancing the QOL therefore special measures should be taken to customize the device to the body structure and needs of the customers as anything that can improve their lives even to a minor extent can prove very helpful.
脊髓损伤患者轮椅使用者满意度及其对身体活动和生活质量的影响
背景脊髓损伤(SCI)幸存者在很大程度上依赖辅助设备,花费大约9-11英镑 每天坐在轮椅上几个小时。只要设备令人满意,它既可以作为障碍,也可以作为促进者,对他们的行动能力、社区参与、生活质量和功能独立性产生积极影响。然而,关于用户满意度及其对流动性和幸福感的影响的信息却很少。鉴于此,本研究旨在确定SCI患者轮椅使用者的满意度及其对体育活动和生活质量的影响。方法在白沙瓦市截瘫中心采用“魁北克用户对辅助技术的满意度评价(QUEST)”对130名轮椅使用者进行横断面调查,“身体残疾者身体活动量表(PASIPD),用于身体活动和世界卫生组织生活质量(WHOQOL-BREF)对于QOL。结果研究对象的平均年龄为32.48±11.96岁。大多数参与者是男性,其中大多数是手动轮椅使用者。近80%是老用户。QUEST的计算平均值为3.23±0.51,PASIPD为24.49±27.66。WHOQOL-BREF在环境56.00(19.00)和心理56.00(12.00)领域的计算中位数(IQR)最高,其次是物理领域50.00(19.00。另一方面,除了生活质量的心理领域(rs=0.156,p=0.076)外,生理领域(rs=0.0394,p<0.001)、社会领域(rs0.303,p<0.001)和环境领域(rs0.425,p<0.001)之间存在显著的正相关。结论大多数参与者表现出中等程度的满意度,并观察到其对生活质量的物理、社会和环境领域的影响。适当的轮椅可以提高生活质量,因此应该采取特殊措施,根据客户的身体结构和需求定制设备,因为任何能在很小程度上改善他们生活的东西都会非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine offers you the most up-to-date information about physical medicine in clinic and practice, as well as interdisciplinary information about rehabilitation medicine and spa medicine. Publishing 6 issues a year, the journal includes selected original research articles and reviews as well as guidelines and summaries of the latest research findings. The journal also publishes society news and editorial material. “Online first” publication ensures rapid dissemination of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信