The value of MRI in evaluating the therapeutic effect of desmoid-type fibromatosis

Q4 Medicine
Hui-ci Zhu, Xiao-Ting Li, Shu Li, Xiaoyan Zhang, Zhen Guan, Yingshi Sun
{"title":"The value of MRI in evaluating the therapeutic effect of desmoid-type fibromatosis","authors":"Hui-ci Zhu, Xiao-Ting Li, Shu Li, Xiaoyan Zhang, Zhen Guan, Yingshi Sun","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the characteristics of MRI signals in different therapeutic effect of desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF). \n \n \nMethods \nOne hundred and twenty-four DF patients with pathologically proven postoperative recurrent lesions from Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2008 to 2015 were enrolled in the study. All patients had baseline MRI scans, followed by once MRI scan at least every six months, and the follow-up period was three years. All patients had MRI images at the end of the third year. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, and the patients were divided into three groups: progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR). Differences in features in the PD, SD, and PR groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, or Chi-square test. Multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni to correct P values. The spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between signal score and tumor maximum diameter. \n \n \nResults \nAmong the 124 patients, 17 experienced PD, 37 exhibited SD and 70 exhibited PR. There were no significant differences in age, gender distribution and the location of lesion among three groups (P>0.05). The difference of treatment strategies was statistically significant (P 0.05). At the last follow-up MRI scan, the T2 signal scores, the changes of T2 signal, the scores of enhancement and the changes of enhancement of the PD, SD, and PR groups were significantly different among three groups (P<0.05). At the last follow-up MRI scan, the tumor maximum diameter was positively correlated with the score of T2 signal (r=0.434, P<0.01), and the tumor maximum diameter was positively correlated with the score of enhancement (r=0.743, P<0.01). \n \n \nConclusion \nMRI has great value in evaluating the therapeutic effect of DF. \n \n \nKey words: \nMagnetic resonance imaging; Desmoid-type fibromatosis; Therapeutic effect evaluation","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.01.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the characteristics of MRI signals in different therapeutic effect of desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF). Methods One hundred and twenty-four DF patients with pathologically proven postoperative recurrent lesions from Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2008 to 2015 were enrolled in the study. All patients had baseline MRI scans, followed by once MRI scan at least every six months, and the follow-up period was three years. All patients had MRI images at the end of the third year. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, and the patients were divided into three groups: progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR). Differences in features in the PD, SD, and PR groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, or Chi-square test. Multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni to correct P values. The spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between signal score and tumor maximum diameter. Results Among the 124 patients, 17 experienced PD, 37 exhibited SD and 70 exhibited PR. There were no significant differences in age, gender distribution and the location of lesion among three groups (P>0.05). The difference of treatment strategies was statistically significant (P 0.05). At the last follow-up MRI scan, the T2 signal scores, the changes of T2 signal, the scores of enhancement and the changes of enhancement of the PD, SD, and PR groups were significantly different among three groups (P<0.05). At the last follow-up MRI scan, the tumor maximum diameter was positively correlated with the score of T2 signal (r=0.434, P<0.01), and the tumor maximum diameter was positively correlated with the score of enhancement (r=0.743, P<0.01). Conclusion MRI has great value in evaluating the therapeutic effect of DF. Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging; Desmoid-type fibromatosis; Therapeutic effect evaluation
MRI在评价纤维瘤病疗效中的价值
目的比较不同疗效的硬纤维样纤维瘤病(DF)的MRI信号特征。方法选择2008~2015年北京大学癌症医院经病理证实的术后复发性DF患者124例。所有患者都进行了基线MRI扫描,然后至少每六个月进行一次MRI扫描,随访期为三年。所有患者在第三年结束时都有MRI图像。采用实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)评价疗效,将患者分为三组:进展性疾病(PD)、稳定性疾病(SD)和部分反应(PR)。使用单向方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis或卡方检验比较PD、SD和PR组的特征差异。使用Bonferroni进行多次比较以校正P值。spearman相关系数用于检验信号评分与肿瘤最大直径之间的相关性。结果124例患者中,17例出现PD,37例出现SD,70例出现PR。三组患者的年龄、性别分布和病变部位差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗策略差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),PD、SD和PR组的增强评分和增强变化在三组之间有显著差异(P<0.05)。在最后一次随访MRI扫描时,肿瘤最大直径与T2信号评分呈正相关(r=0.434,P<0.01),肿瘤最大直径与增强评分呈正相关(r=0.743,P<0.01)。结论MRI对评价DF的疗效有重要价值。关键词:磁共振成像;筛状纤维瘤病;疗效评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信