Memoirs of women-in-conflict: Ugandan ex-combatants and the production of knowledge on security and peacebuilding

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
D. Curtis, F. Ebila, Maria Martin de Almagro
{"title":"Memoirs of women-in-conflict: Ugandan ex-combatants and the production of knowledge on security and peacebuilding","authors":"D. Curtis, F. Ebila, Maria Martin de Almagro","doi":"10.1177/09670106211064040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The limitations of conventional accounts of security and peacebuilding drawing upon the ‘expert’ knowledge of military elites, policymakers and civil society representatives have been widely recognized. This has led security and peacebuilding policymakers, including through the United Nations Women, Peace and Security agenda, to search for alternative forms of knowledge, such as memoirs, photographs or oral histories, that better reflect lived experiences within local communities. Building on existing work on memoirs as knowledge production artefacts and on feminist security studies, this article demystifies experiential security knowledge through an analysis of three memoirs written by women ex-combatants in Uganda. We argue that while the memoirs offer complex and contradictory narratives about women ex-combatants, they are also the products of transnational mediated processes, whereby the interests of power translate complex narratives into consolidated representations and sturdy tropes of the abducted African woman ex-combatant. This means that although the three memoirs provide some hints as to transformative ways of thinking about security and peace, and offer dynamic accounts of personal experiences, they also reflect the politics of dominant representational practices.","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"53 1","pages":"402 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211064040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The limitations of conventional accounts of security and peacebuilding drawing upon the ‘expert’ knowledge of military elites, policymakers and civil society representatives have been widely recognized. This has led security and peacebuilding policymakers, including through the United Nations Women, Peace and Security agenda, to search for alternative forms of knowledge, such as memoirs, photographs or oral histories, that better reflect lived experiences within local communities. Building on existing work on memoirs as knowledge production artefacts and on feminist security studies, this article demystifies experiential security knowledge through an analysis of three memoirs written by women ex-combatants in Uganda. We argue that while the memoirs offer complex and contradictory narratives about women ex-combatants, they are also the products of transnational mediated processes, whereby the interests of power translate complex narratives into consolidated representations and sturdy tropes of the abducted African woman ex-combatant. This means that although the three memoirs provide some hints as to transformative ways of thinking about security and peace, and offer dynamic accounts of personal experiences, they also reflect the politics of dominant representational practices.
冲突中的妇女回忆录:乌干达前战斗人员和安全与建设和平知识的生产
利用军事精英、决策者和民间社会代表的“专家”知识对安全与建设和平进行传统描述的局限性已得到广泛承认。这导致安全和建设和平政策制定者,包括通过联合国妇女、和平与安全议程,寻找能更好地反映当地社区生活经历的回忆录、照片或口述历史等其他形式的知识。在现有关于回忆录作为知识生产工艺品和女权主义安全研究的工作基础上,本文通过分析乌干达女性前战斗人员撰写的三本回忆录,揭开了经验安全知识的神秘面纱。我们认为,虽然回忆录提供了关于女性前战斗人员的复杂而矛盾的叙述,但它们也是跨国调解过程的产物,权力利益将复杂的叙述转化为被绑架的非洲女性前战斗员的统一表述和有力比喻。这意味着,尽管这三本回忆录提供了一些关于安全与和平的变革性思维方式的暗示,并对个人经历进行了动态描述,但它们也反映了占主导地位的代表实践的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信