Activity of Immunotherapy Regimens on Primary Renal Tumours: A Systematic Review

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.3233/kca-220012
James O. Jones, Will Ince, S. Welsh, G. Stewart
{"title":"Activity of Immunotherapy Regimens on Primary Renal Tumours: A Systematic Review","authors":"James O. Jones, Will Ince, S. Welsh, G. Stewart","doi":"10.3233/kca-220012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are widely used in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) forms part of multimodality treatment in advanced disease, however there is no prospective evidence for its use in the ICPI era. Trials of neoadjuvant ICPIs in RCC are underway; understanding the anticipated effect of ICPIs on the primary tumour may help clinical decision making in both localised and advanced settings. METHODS: A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov) of English literature from 2012 to 2022 was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. 2,398 records were identified, 54 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In the metastatic setting, response in the primary tumour (≥30% reduction in size) is seen in 33–56% of patients treated with dual ICPI or ICPI + VEGFR-TKI. Pathological complete response rates were 14% for patients undergoing CN after a period of ICPI therapy. In the neoadjuvant setting there is a single published trial of VEGFR-TKI + ICPI, 30% of patients had a≥30% reduction in size of the primary. This appears superior to single agent ICPI. Grade 3 adverse event rates are comparable to the metastatic setting. CONCLUSIONS: A period of ICPI combination therapy followed by nephrectomy may be considered for selected patients as a strategy to manage metastatic disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, it is not clear whether ICPI + VEGFR-TKI is superior to VEGFR-TKI alone. There is minimal data on whether either CN after ICPI in metastatic patients, or neoadjuvant ICPI therapy for localised disease, improves long term survival.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-220012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are widely used in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) forms part of multimodality treatment in advanced disease, however there is no prospective evidence for its use in the ICPI era. Trials of neoadjuvant ICPIs in RCC are underway; understanding the anticipated effect of ICPIs on the primary tumour may help clinical decision making in both localised and advanced settings. METHODS: A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov) of English literature from 2012 to 2022 was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. 2,398 records were identified, 54 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In the metastatic setting, response in the primary tumour (≥30% reduction in size) is seen in 33–56% of patients treated with dual ICPI or ICPI + VEGFR-TKI. Pathological complete response rates were 14% for patients undergoing CN after a period of ICPI therapy. In the neoadjuvant setting there is a single published trial of VEGFR-TKI + ICPI, 30% of patients had a≥30% reduction in size of the primary. This appears superior to single agent ICPI. Grade 3 adverse event rates are comparable to the metastatic setting. CONCLUSIONS: A period of ICPI combination therapy followed by nephrectomy may be considered for selected patients as a strategy to manage metastatic disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, it is not clear whether ICPI + VEGFR-TKI is superior to VEGFR-TKI alone. There is minimal data on whether either CN after ICPI in metastatic patients, or neoadjuvant ICPI therapy for localised disease, improves long term survival.
免疫治疗方案对原发性肾肿瘤的活性:一项系统综述
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICPI)广泛应用于治疗转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)。细胞减少性肾切除术(CN)是晚期疾病多模式治疗的一部分,但在ICPI时代没有使用它的前瞻性证据。新佐剂ICPI在RCC中的试验正在进行中;了解ICPI对原发性肿瘤的预期影响可能有助于在局部和晚期环境中做出临床决策。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对2012年至2022年的英语文献进行系统检索(PubMed,Web of Science,clinicaltrials.gov)。确定了2398份记录,其中54份被纳入分析。结果:在转移性环境中,33–56%接受双重ICPI或ICPI+VEGFR-TKI治疗的患者对原发性肿瘤有反应(大小缩小≥30%)。在ICPI治疗一段时间后,接受CN的患者的病理完全缓解率为14%。在新佐剂环境中,有一项VEGFR-TKI+ICPI的单一已发表试验,30%的患者原发性肿瘤大小缩小≥30%。这似乎优于单剂ICPI。3级不良事件发生率与转移情况相当。结论:对于选定的患者,可以考虑在肾切除后进行一段时间的ICPI联合治疗,作为治疗转移性疾病的策略。在新佐剂设置中,尚不清楚ICPI+VEGFR-TKI是否优于单独的VEGFR-TKI。关于转移性患者ICPI后的CN,或局部疾病的新辅助ICPI治疗是否能提高长期生存率,目前的数据很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信