Application of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure Combined with Extraperitoneal Colostomy in Laparoscopic Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer

H. Yao, Jipan Liu, Cai-Hong Sun, Chengjun Wang, Yun Li, Li Li, Binde Zhao, Jia Liu
{"title":"Application of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure Combined with Extraperitoneal Colostomy in Laparoscopic Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer","authors":"H. Yao, Jipan Liu, Cai-Hong Sun, Chengjun Wang, Yun Li, Li Li, Binde Zhao, Jia Liu","doi":"10.26689/par.v7i3.4869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the treatment of colorectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery has seen a significant amount of success. Reducing the risk of postoperative complications and improving patients’ quality of life can be accomplished by appropriately employing pelvic peritoneal repair and sigmoid colostomy when appropriate. Objective: To compare fusion closure of pelvic peritoneum combined with extraperitoneal colostomy with non-closure of pelvic peritoneum combined with intraperitoneal colostomy in patients with low rectal cancer who had permanent colostomy. Methods: Low rectal cancer patients admitted to Hengshui People’s Hospital for permanent colostomy were evaluated. The participants were divided into two groups: an observation and a control group. All 30 cases in the observation group underwent pelvic peritoneum closure and extraperitoneal colostomy, while the other 30 cases in the control group underwent intraperitoneal colostomy. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of the participants in both groups were evaluated for 6 months to 2 years (24 h before, 24 h after, 48 h after, 96 h after surgery). Results: Comparing the colostomy operative time, time to  first passage of flatus postoperatively, time to first defecation postoperatively, length of hospital stay, laboratory indicators, stoma-related complications, colostomy function, etc., the colostomy operative time significantly differed between the two groups (P < 0.05); the observation group did considerably better than the control group in terms of stoma-related complications and bowel movement control 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05); and although serum CRP levels increased in both groups 48 h after surgery, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Extraperitoneal colostomy can improve the quality of life of patients with permanent stoma and reduce the occurrence of stoma-related complications. Thus, this technique is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":61025,"journal":{"name":"抗癌研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"抗癌研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i3.4869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the treatment of colorectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery has seen a significant amount of success. Reducing the risk of postoperative complications and improving patients’ quality of life can be accomplished by appropriately employing pelvic peritoneal repair and sigmoid colostomy when appropriate. Objective: To compare fusion closure of pelvic peritoneum combined with extraperitoneal colostomy with non-closure of pelvic peritoneum combined with intraperitoneal colostomy in patients with low rectal cancer who had permanent colostomy. Methods: Low rectal cancer patients admitted to Hengshui People’s Hospital for permanent colostomy were evaluated. The participants were divided into two groups: an observation and a control group. All 30 cases in the observation group underwent pelvic peritoneum closure and extraperitoneal colostomy, while the other 30 cases in the control group underwent intraperitoneal colostomy. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of the participants in both groups were evaluated for 6 months to 2 years (24 h before, 24 h after, 48 h after, 96 h after surgery). Results: Comparing the colostomy operative time, time to  first passage of flatus postoperatively, time to first defecation postoperatively, length of hospital stay, laboratory indicators, stoma-related complications, colostomy function, etc., the colostomy operative time significantly differed between the two groups (P < 0.05); the observation group did considerably better than the control group in terms of stoma-related complications and bowel movement control 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05); and although serum CRP levels increased in both groups 48 h after surgery, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Extraperitoneal colostomy can improve the quality of life of patients with permanent stoma and reduce the occurrence of stoma-related complications. Thus, this technique is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.
盆腔腹膜闭合联合腹膜外结肠造口术在低位直肠癌腹腔镜手术中的应用
背景:在癌症的治疗中,腹腔镜手术取得了显著的成功。适当采用盆腔腹膜修补术和乙状结肠造口术可以降低术后并发症的风险,提高患者的生活质量。目的:对长期结肠造瘘的低位癌症患者进行盆腔腹膜融合闭合联合腹膜外结肠造瘘与盆腔腹膜非闭合联合腹膜内结肠造瘘比较。方法:对衡水市人民医院收治的癌症低位永久性结肠造口患者进行评价。参与者被分为两组:观察组和对照组。观察组30例均行盆腔腹膜闭合和腹膜外结肠造口术,对照组30例行腹膜内结肠造口术。对两组参与者的C反应蛋白(CRP)水平进行了6个月至2年的评估(手术前24小时、手术后24小时、术后48小时和手术后96小时)。结果:比较两组结肠造口术时间、术后第一次排便时间、住院时间、实验室指标、造瘘并发症、结肠造口功能等,两组结肠造瘘术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组在造瘘并发症及术后6个月排便控制方面明显优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术后48h血清CRP水平虽有升高,但差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹膜外结肠造口术可提高永久性造口患者的生活质量,减少造口相关并发症的发生。因此,该技术值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信