FROM NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) TO THE TREATY ON PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (TPNW): SHIFTING PARADIGM AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION’S OBSTACLES

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Nahda Anisa Rahma
{"title":"FROM NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT) TO THE TREATY ON PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (TPNW): SHIFTING PARADIGM AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION’S OBSTACLES","authors":"Nahda Anisa Rahma","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v29i2.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its enforcement in 1970, it is evident that the negotiations process towards nuclear disarmament under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) has encountered stagnation. This fact led to the inception of the Treaty on the Prohibition of nuclear weapons (TPNW) which possesses a distinct characteristic of NPT. TPNW utilizes a more digestible humanitarian approach, which emphasized the catastrophic impacts of possessing nuclear weapons, rather than the complex state-security approach. This study aims to primarily provide an in-depth understanding regarding the shifting regime from NPT to TPNW and nuclear disarmament in general. The author conducts the research by using the literature research method, and thereafter analyzes the relevance and employs the arguments contained in the literature critically. The research shows that the traditional paradigm in NPT is insufficient to achieve the goal of complete nuclear disarmament, as it only focuses on the interest and security of the states. Thus delegitimizing the existence of public participation, which is important to put pressure to mobilize the political will of the state. This article also shows the possible obstacles that TPNW might face during its upcoming implementation.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i2.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its enforcement in 1970, it is evident that the negotiations process towards nuclear disarmament under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) has encountered stagnation. This fact led to the inception of the Treaty on the Prohibition of nuclear weapons (TPNW) which possesses a distinct characteristic of NPT. TPNW utilizes a more digestible humanitarian approach, which emphasized the catastrophic impacts of possessing nuclear weapons, rather than the complex state-security approach. This study aims to primarily provide an in-depth understanding regarding the shifting regime from NPT to TPNW and nuclear disarmament in general. The author conducts the research by using the literature research method, and thereafter analyzes the relevance and employs the arguments contained in the literature critically. The research shows that the traditional paradigm in NPT is insufficient to achieve the goal of complete nuclear disarmament, as it only focuses on the interest and security of the states. Thus delegitimizing the existence of public participation, which is important to put pressure to mobilize the political will of the state. This article also shows the possible obstacles that TPNW might face during its upcoming implementation.
从核不扩散条约(npt)到禁止核武器条约(tpnw):范式的转变及其实施障碍
自1970年《不扩散核武器条约》(不扩散条约)实施以来,根据该条约实现核裁军的谈判进程显然遇到了停滞。这一事实导致了《禁止核武器条约》(禁核条约)的开始,该条约具有《不扩散条约》的明显特点。TPNW采用了一种更容易理解的人道主义方法,强调拥有核武器的灾难性影响,而不是复杂的国家安全方法。本研究的主要目的是深入了解从《不扩散核武器条约》到《禁止核武器条约》的体制转变以及一般的核裁军。笔者采用文献研究法进行研究,然后对相关性进行分析,并批判性地运用文献中的论点。研究表明,《不扩散核武器条约》的传统范式只关注国家的利益和安全,不足以实现彻底核裁军的目标。这样一来,公众参与的存在就失去了合法性,而这对于施加压力以调动国家的政治意愿是很重要的。本文还展示了TPNW在即将到来的实施过程中可能面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信