Synergistic effects of chemical mixtures: How frequent is rare?

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Olwenn V. Martin
{"title":"Synergistic effects of chemical mixtures: How frequent is rare?","authors":"Olwenn V. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chemical pollution is characterised by sequential and simultaneous exposure to unintentional complex mixtures. The almost infinite number of real-life mixtures poses major challenges for investigations of all possible exposure scenarios through whole mixture or component-based approaches. As a pragmatic approach in data-poor situations, the application of a Mixture Assessment Factor to single substances assessments under REACH was announced in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. Current proposals for this factor are based on the assumption that mixtures behave additively, assuming that synergistic interactions are rare. This assumption is based on eight reviews published in the last 30 years. Synergistic deviations from additivity greater than two-fold were reported in roughly 5% of investigated mixtures. This was more, rather than less, frequent in the handful of suitable studies of low-dose mammalian mixture toxicity. This frequency is representative of mixtures toxicology studies in the literature and should not be interpreted as the frequency of synergisms in real-world exposures. Understanding the frequency and likelihood of synergisms would entail detailed understanding of the co-occurrence of groups of substances giving rise to such interactions in relevant environmental media. Assumptions that synergistic interactions in real-life mixtures are rare appear to be premature. While further research is required, potential synergisms should not be omitted from debates on the conservatism or otherwise of mixture allocation factor or other regulatory approaches to protect people and environment from mixture effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202023000396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical pollution is characterised by sequential and simultaneous exposure to unintentional complex mixtures. The almost infinite number of real-life mixtures poses major challenges for investigations of all possible exposure scenarios through whole mixture or component-based approaches. As a pragmatic approach in data-poor situations, the application of a Mixture Assessment Factor to single substances assessments under REACH was announced in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. Current proposals for this factor are based on the assumption that mixtures behave additively, assuming that synergistic interactions are rare. This assumption is based on eight reviews published in the last 30 years. Synergistic deviations from additivity greater than two-fold were reported in roughly 5% of investigated mixtures. This was more, rather than less, frequent in the handful of suitable studies of low-dose mammalian mixture toxicity. This frequency is representative of mixtures toxicology studies in the literature and should not be interpreted as the frequency of synergisms in real-world exposures. Understanding the frequency and likelihood of synergisms would entail detailed understanding of the co-occurrence of groups of substances giving rise to such interactions in relevant environmental media. Assumptions that synergistic interactions in real-life mixtures are rare appear to be premature. While further research is required, potential synergisms should not be omitted from debates on the conservatism or otherwise of mixture allocation factor or other regulatory approaches to protect people and environment from mixture effects.

化学混合物的协同效应:有多罕见?
化学污染的特点是连续和同时暴露于无意的复杂混合物中。几乎无限数量的真实混合物对通过全混合物或组分为基础的方法调查所有可能的暴露情景提出了重大挑战。作为在数据贫乏情况下的一种务实方法,《欧洲化学品可持续发展战略》宣布将混合评估因子应用于REACH下的单一物质评估。目前关于这一因素的建议是基于混合物表现为加性的假设,假设协同作用是罕见的。这一假设是基于过去30年发表的8篇综述。据报道,在大约5%的被调查混合物中,增效偏差大于两倍。在少数合适的低剂量哺乳动物混合物毒性研究中,这种情况更常见,而不是更少。这一频率是文献中混合物毒理学研究的代表,不应被解释为实际暴露中协同作用的频率。了解协同作用的频率和可能性需要详细了解在相关环境介质中产生这种相互作用的物质群的共现情况。假设在现实生活中的混合物中很少有协同作用,这似乎是不成熟的。虽然需要进一步的研究,但在关于保守主义或其他混合分配因素或其他保护人类和环境免受混合影响的管制方法的辩论中,不应忽略潜在的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信