FBF: On the Justiciability of Soft Law and Broadening the Discretion of EU Agencies

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S157401962200013X

M. Chamon, Nathan de Arriba-Sellier

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Before FBF was decided by the Court of Justice, it was described as a golden opportunity to transform a ‘wind of change’ into a ‘perfect storm’. In this metaphor, the wind represented different national legal systems becoming increasingly receptive to the judicial review of soft law, while the perfect storm would be the Court of Justice revisiting its own restrictive approach towards the justiciability of soft law.1

查看原文本刊更多论文

软法的可诉性与欧盟机构自由裁量权的扩大

在FBF被法院裁决之前，它被描述为将“变革之风”转变为“完美风暴”的黄金机会。在这个比喻中，风代表不同的国家法律制度越来越接受对软法的司法审查，而完美的风暴将是法院重新审视其对软法可诉性的限制性做法

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.