Liquidity creation and bank performance: evidence from MENA

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ahmad Sahyouni, M. Wang
{"title":"Liquidity creation and bank performance: evidence from MENA","authors":"Ahmad Sahyouni, M. Wang","doi":"10.1108/IJIF-01-2018-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIslamic banks have significantly different balance sheets from their conventional counterparts, leading to different implications in relation to liquidity creation compared to conventional banks. This work, first, investigates the liquidity creation of conventional and Islamic banks in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries between 2011 and 2016. It then tests the relationship between liquidity creation and performance of these banks.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIt uses the data of 491 commercial banks across 18 MENA countries between 2011 and 2016. The analysis is based on panel data techniques.\n\n\nFindings\nThe banks created US$18.596 trillion of liquidity, about 28.4% of total assets. Conventional banks created more liquidity compared with Islamic banks. Nevertheless, Islamic banks created more liquidity per asset compared with conventional banks. The regression analysis revealed a significant and negative correlation between liquidity creation and performance of the banks using return on average equity (ROAE) measure. However, no significant relationship is observed between liquidity creation and return on average assets (ROAA) of MENA banks. Moreover, there is no difference between Islamic and conventional banks in the relation between liquidity creation and bank performance.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe data are limited to the period 2011-2016; the period of this study was selected based on yearly data availability from the data source. Accounting measures were used to study the effect of liquidity creation on bank profitability, and the market-based measures were excluded, as there is no uniform sources in these countries that can be used to collect market-based data.\n\n\nPractical implications\nBank managers must reach a trade-off between the advantages and disadvantages of liquidity creation, as well as consider the negative relationship between liquidity creation and bank performance when making their decisions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFirst, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first to analyse the relationship between the liquidity creation and performance of conventional and Islamic banks in MENA. Second, this study uses a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in MENA that have detailed information on the Orbis Bank Focus dataset, which is the most comprehensive database of commercial banks in the MENA region.\n","PeriodicalId":54072,"journal":{"name":"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJIF-01-2018-0009","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2018-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Purpose Islamic banks have significantly different balance sheets from their conventional counterparts, leading to different implications in relation to liquidity creation compared to conventional banks. This work, first, investigates the liquidity creation of conventional and Islamic banks in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries between 2011 and 2016. It then tests the relationship between liquidity creation and performance of these banks. Design/methodology/approach It uses the data of 491 commercial banks across 18 MENA countries between 2011 and 2016. The analysis is based on panel data techniques. Findings The banks created US$18.596 trillion of liquidity, about 28.4% of total assets. Conventional banks created more liquidity compared with Islamic banks. Nevertheless, Islamic banks created more liquidity per asset compared with conventional banks. The regression analysis revealed a significant and negative correlation between liquidity creation and performance of the banks using return on average equity (ROAE) measure. However, no significant relationship is observed between liquidity creation and return on average assets (ROAA) of MENA banks. Moreover, there is no difference between Islamic and conventional banks in the relation between liquidity creation and bank performance. Research limitations/implications The data are limited to the period 2011-2016; the period of this study was selected based on yearly data availability from the data source. Accounting measures were used to study the effect of liquidity creation on bank profitability, and the market-based measures were excluded, as there is no uniform sources in these countries that can be used to collect market-based data. Practical implications Bank managers must reach a trade-off between the advantages and disadvantages of liquidity creation, as well as consider the negative relationship between liquidity creation and bank performance when making their decisions. Originality/value First, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first to analyse the relationship between the liquidity creation and performance of conventional and Islamic banks in MENA. Second, this study uses a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in MENA that have detailed information on the Orbis Bank Focus dataset, which is the most comprehensive database of commercial banks in the MENA region.
流动性创造与银行业绩:中东和北非地区的证据
有目的的伊斯兰银行与传统银行的资产负债表明显不同,导致与传统银行相比,其在流动性创造方面的影响不同。这项工作首先调查了2011年至2016年间中东和北非国家传统银行和伊斯兰银行的流动性创造情况。然后,它测试了这些银行的流动性创造和业绩之间的关系。设计/方法/方法它使用了2011年至2016年间中东和北非地区18个国家491家商业银行的数据。该分析基于面板数据技术。发现银行创造了18.596万亿美元的流动性,约占总资产的28.4%。与伊斯兰银行相比,传统银行创造了更多的流动性。尽管如此,与传统银行相比,伊斯兰银行的每项资产创造了更多的流动性。回归分析显示,使用平均股本回报率(ROAE)衡量标准,流动性创造和银行业绩之间存在显著的负相关。然而,中东和北非地区银行的流动性创造与平均资产回报率之间没有显著关系。此外,伊斯兰银行和传统银行在流动性创造和银行业绩之间的关系上没有区别。研究局限性/含义数据仅限于2011-2016年期间;本研究的时间段是根据数据源的年度数据可用性选择的。会计措施被用来研究流动性创造对银行盈利能力的影响,而基于市场的措施被排除在外,因为这些国家没有统一的来源可以用来收集基于市场的数据。实际含义银行经理在做出决策时,必须在创造流动性的优势和劣势之间进行权衡,并考虑创造流动性与银行业绩之间的负面关系。原创性/价值首先,据作者所知,这项工作首次分析了中东和北非地区传统银行和伊斯兰银行的流动性创造与业绩之间的关系。其次,本研究使用了中东和北非地区伊斯兰和传统银行的样本,这些银行在Orbis Bank Focus数据集上有详细信息,该数据集是中东和北非区域最全面的商业银行数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: It is the aspiration of the editorial committee that IJIF achieves the highest rank in quality and substance. It is thus our aim that the journal be carried in the Thompson Reuters’ ISI and Scopus databases. By ensuring high standards in articles published in Islamic finance we ensure that further innovation and research is carried out and promoted in the Islamic finance industry and academia. IJIF publishes 2 issues per annum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信