Soil aggregate variation in two contrasting rice straw recycling systems for paddy soil amendment over two years

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Wenqi Gu, Weiming Zhang, Liqun Xiu, Yuanyuan Sun, Di Wu, Yuning Wang, Honggui Zhang, H. Yuan, Zhibo Feng, J. Meng, Wenfu Chen
{"title":"Soil aggregate variation in two contrasting rice straw recycling systems for paddy soil amendment over two years","authors":"Wenqi Gu, Weiming Zhang, Liqun Xiu, Yuanyuan Sun, Di Wu, Yuning Wang, Honggui Zhang, H. Yuan, Zhibo Feng, J. Meng, Wenfu Chen","doi":"10.1080/03650340.2023.2196618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Soil aggregate is important to soil quality. Straw return is beneficial for soil amendment, but the effects of straw and straw-derived biochar on aggregate formation and stability in paddy soil are unclear. This study carried out a field experiment for 2 years in Northeast China with four treatments: conventional fertilization (CF), straw (ST, 7.5 t ha−1 year−1), biochar (BC, 2.5 t ha−1 year−1), and biochar-based fertilizer (BCF, 0.75 t ha−1 year−1). Compared with the CF and BCF, BC and ST improved the macroaggregates and significantly increased soil total carbon and aggregate organic carbon, indicating a sustained positive role in promoting the formation and stability of aggregates. BC significantly improved aggregate stability. Correlation analysis showed that macroaggregates (2–0.25 mm) can be increased by increasing the heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC), BC and ST significantly increased the HFOC, and BC had a greater effect. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the combination of biochar and soil particles can be captured with strong water scouring. BCF showed an increasing trend in the formation and stability of soil aggregates. In comparison, biochar had a greater effect on promoting the formation of macroaggregates and the stability of soil aggregates with a significant sustainable effect.","PeriodicalId":8154,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","volume":"69 1","pages":"3044 - 3059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2196618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soil aggregate is important to soil quality. Straw return is beneficial for soil amendment, but the effects of straw and straw-derived biochar on aggregate formation and stability in paddy soil are unclear. This study carried out a field experiment for 2 years in Northeast China with four treatments: conventional fertilization (CF), straw (ST, 7.5 t ha−1 year−1), biochar (BC, 2.5 t ha−1 year−1), and biochar-based fertilizer (BCF, 0.75 t ha−1 year−1). Compared with the CF and BCF, BC and ST improved the macroaggregates and significantly increased soil total carbon and aggregate organic carbon, indicating a sustained positive role in promoting the formation and stability of aggregates. BC significantly improved aggregate stability. Correlation analysis showed that macroaggregates (2–0.25 mm) can be increased by increasing the heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC), BC and ST significantly increased the HFOC, and BC had a greater effect. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the combination of biochar and soil particles can be captured with strong water scouring. BCF showed an increasing trend in the formation and stability of soil aggregates. In comparison, biochar had a greater effect on promoting the formation of macroaggregates and the stability of soil aggregates with a significant sustainable effect.
两种不同水稻秸秆循环利用系统2年土壤团聚体变化特征
土壤团聚体对土壤质量具有重要影响。秸秆还田有利于土壤修复,但秸秆及其生物炭对水稻土团聚体形成和稳定性的影响尚不清楚。本研究在东北地区进行了为期2年的田间试验,采用常规施肥(CF)、秸秆施肥(ST, 7.5 t / h−1年−1)、生物炭施肥(BC, 2.5 t / h−1年−1)和生物炭基肥料(BCF, 0.75 t / h−1年−1)4种处理。与CF和BCF相比,BC和ST改善了大团聚体,显著增加了土壤总碳和团聚体有机碳,表明对团聚体的形成和稳定具有持续的积极作用。BC显著提高了骨料稳定性。相关分析表明,增加重馏分有机碳(HFOC)可以增加大团聚体(2 ~ 0.25 mm), BC和ST显著增加了HFOC, BC的作用更大。扫描电镜(SEM)结果表明,强力水冲刷可以捕获生物炭与土壤颗粒的结合。土壤团聚体的形成和稳定性呈增加趋势。相比之下,生物炭对促进大团聚体形成和土壤团聚体稳定性的作用更大,且具有显著的可持续效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: rchives of Agronomy and Soil Science is a well-established journal that has been in publication for over fifty years. The Journal publishes papers over the entire range of agronomy and soil science. Manuscripts involved in developing and testing hypotheses to understand casual relationships in the following areas: plant nutrition fertilizers manure soil tillage soil biotechnology and ecophysiology amelioration irrigation and drainage plant production on arable and grass land agroclimatology landscape formation and environmental management in rural regions management of natural and created wetland ecosystems bio-geochemical processes soil-plant-microbe interactions and rhizosphere processes soil morphology, classification, monitoring, heterogeneity and scales reuse of waste waters and biosolids of agri-industrial origin in soil are especially encouraged. As well as original contributions, the Journal also publishes current reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信