Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Polity Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1086/724189
Christin Bird, Zachary A. McGee
{"title":"Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal","authors":"Christin Bird, Zachary A. McGee","doi":"10.1086/724189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conservative legal movement has been gaining traction for nearly half a century and owes much of its success and incorporation into mainstream American politics to the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc). After a blockbuster 2021 term, many Americans noticed the power of a new conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court. This ideological composition is the result of decades of careful training of American jurists by FedSoc affiliates paired with tactful political maneuvering to allow their originalist allies to ascend to the highest level. The insurmountable conservative supermajority at the Supreme Court leaves left-of-center interests with little choice than to concentrate efforts at intermediate federal appeals courts. The recent rulings’ policy implications, including those considered by our colleagues in this symposium such as gun control, abortion, environmental regulation, free speech, free exercise, as well as tribal sovereignty, do not bode a welcoming Supreme Court for litigation strategies supporting the goals of left-of-center or","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":"55 1","pages":"389 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The conservative legal movement has been gaining traction for nearly half a century and owes much of its success and incorporation into mainstream American politics to the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc). After a blockbuster 2021 term, many Americans noticed the power of a new conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court. This ideological composition is the result of decades of careful training of American jurists by FedSoc affiliates paired with tactful political maneuvering to allow their originalist allies to ascend to the highest level. The insurmountable conservative supermajority at the Supreme Court leaves left-of-center interests with little choice than to concentrate efforts at intermediate federal appeals courts. The recent rulings’ policy implications, including those considered by our colleagues in this symposium such as gun control, abortion, environmental regulation, free speech, free exercise, as well as tribal sovereignty, do not bode a welcoming Supreme Court for litigation strategies supporting the goals of left-of-center or
前瞻:美国巡回上诉法院的利益集团法律战略与联邦制社会关系
近半个世纪以来,保守的法律运动一直受到关注,它的成功和融入美国主流政治在很大程度上要归功于联邦党人法律和公共政策研究协会(Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies,简称FedSoc)。在经历了2021年的重磅任期后,许多美国人注意到最高法院中新的保守派绝对多数的力量。这种意识形态构成是联邦安全委员会下属机构数十年来对美国法学家进行精心训练的结果,同时也是巧妙的政治操作的结果,以使他们的原旨主义盟友能够上升到最高水平。保守派在最高法院占据不可逾越的绝对多数,这让中间偏左的利益集团别无选择,只能把精力集中在联邦中级上诉法院。最近的裁决的政策含义,包括我们的同事在这次研讨会上考虑的那些,如枪支管制,堕胎,环境法规,言论自由,自由行使,以及部落主权,并不预示着最高法院对支持中间偏左或中立的目标的诉讼策略的欢迎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信