Upholding the dignity of gay men who are (prospective) parents: an analysis of adoption and surrogacy law

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Robert L. Marsh
{"title":"Upholding the dignity of gay men who are (prospective) parents: an analysis of adoption and surrogacy law","authors":"Robert L. Marsh","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2022.2102764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many gay men want to be parents. Some, however, feel unable to explore their parenting desires due to heteronormative understandings of the family which pervade their everyday lives. By inhibiting these gay men from exploring their parenting desires, wider society treats them differently from other social groups and curtails their liberty. Another way of thinking about this, at a more fundamental level, is that wider society is disrespecting the dignity of gay men. While law cannot singlehandedly end the stigma that gay men face, it can uphold their dignity by embracing gay men within the protective legal frameworks that are available to other new parents, and signalling the legitimacy of gay men’s reproductive choices. Through this analytical lens, this article then assesses how far adoption and surrogacy law historically upheld the dignity of gay men who were (prospective) parents; how far they currently do; and if (and how) they could go further. The article concludes that significant progress has been made towards judicial and Parliamentary respect for the parenting desires of gay men, but with scope for improvement, particularly regarding the legislative framework for surrogacy.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":"44 1","pages":"306 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2102764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many gay men want to be parents. Some, however, feel unable to explore their parenting desires due to heteronormative understandings of the family which pervade their everyday lives. By inhibiting these gay men from exploring their parenting desires, wider society treats them differently from other social groups and curtails their liberty. Another way of thinking about this, at a more fundamental level, is that wider society is disrespecting the dignity of gay men. While law cannot singlehandedly end the stigma that gay men face, it can uphold their dignity by embracing gay men within the protective legal frameworks that are available to other new parents, and signalling the legitimacy of gay men’s reproductive choices. Through this analytical lens, this article then assesses how far adoption and surrogacy law historically upheld the dignity of gay men who were (prospective) parents; how far they currently do; and if (and how) they could go further. The article concludes that significant progress has been made towards judicial and Parliamentary respect for the parenting desires of gay men, but with scope for improvement, particularly regarding the legislative framework for surrogacy.
维护作为(未来)父母的男同性恋的尊严:对收养和代孕法的分析
摘要许多男同性恋都想当父母。然而,由于日常生活中普遍存在对家庭的非规范性理解,一些人觉得无法探索自己的育儿欲望。通过禁止这些男同性恋探索他们的育儿欲望,更广泛的社会将他们与其他社会群体区别对待,并限制了他们的自由。另一种更根本的思考方式是,更广泛的社会不尊重男同性恋的尊严。虽然法律不能一手结束男同性恋面临的耻辱,但它可以通过在其他新父母可以获得的保护性法律框架内拥抱男同性恋,并表明男同性恋生育选择的合法性,来维护他们的尊严。通过这种分析视角,本文评估了收养和代孕法在历史上在多大程度上维护了作为(未来)父母的男同性恋的尊严;他们目前的表现;以及他们是否(以及如何)能走得更远。文章的结论是,在司法和议会尊重男同性恋的养育意愿方面取得了重大进展,但仍有改进的余地,特别是在代孕的立法框架方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law is concerned with social and family law and policy in a UK, European and international context. The policy of the Editors and of the Editorial Board is to provide an interdisciplinary forum to which academics and professionals working in the social welfare and related fields may turn for guidance, comment and informed debate. Features: •Articles •Cases •European Section •Current Development •Ombudsman"s Section •Book Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信