{"title":"Cum patuit lecto: A Double Entendre at Propertius 4.4.42","authors":"J. M. Paul","doi":"10.1086/723827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that a first-time reader of Propertius 4.4 has every reason to suspect that the hemiepes cum patuit lecto (42) sets the stage for a lascivious conclusion. Within the works of Propertius, every other instance of lect- with a compatible second-declension masculine termination indicates the noun “bed” rather than the perfect passive participle “gathered.” The reading of “bed” is further corroborated by a close-up on Scylla’s groin (inguina, 40) in the previous pentameter and Ariadne’s (alleged) sexual availability elsewhere in Propertius (1.3.1–2, 2.14.7–8).","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":"118 1","pages":"260 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I argue that a first-time reader of Propertius 4.4 has every reason to suspect that the hemiepes cum patuit lecto (42) sets the stage for a lascivious conclusion. Within the works of Propertius, every other instance of lect- with a compatible second-declension masculine termination indicates the noun “bed” rather than the perfect passive participle “gathered.” The reading of “bed” is further corroborated by a close-up on Scylla’s groin (inguina, 40) in the previous pentameter and Ariadne’s (alleged) sexual availability elsewhere in Propertius (1.3.1–2, 2.14.7–8).
期刊介绍:
Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.