Clinico-mycological profile of recurrent dermatophytosis with drug sensitivity in a tertiary care center in Southern Odisha

Ramachandran Gnanasuriyan, Satyadarshi Patnaik, S. Patro, I. Mohanty
{"title":"Clinico-mycological profile of recurrent dermatophytosis with drug sensitivity in a tertiary care center in Southern Odisha","authors":"Ramachandran Gnanasuriyan, Satyadarshi Patnaik, S. Patro, I. Mohanty","doi":"10.4103/cdr.cdr_58_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recurrent dermatophytosis is a pressing problem worldwide due to inadequate treatment, drug resistance, and indiscriminate use of topical steroids. This scenario increases the need for the study of risk factors and antifungal susceptibility testing. There is a paucity of information on this subject. Objective: We aimed to find the clinico-mycological pattern of recurrent dermatophytic infections, the factors responsible for recurrence and determine the sensitivity pattern of isolates against four antifungals (fluconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and amphotericin B). Materials and Methods: Patients with recurrent dermatophytosis attending the outpatient Department of Our Tertiary Care Institute were enrolled in this study. A detailed history was taken; clinical examination was done; samples were collected for mycological examinations, and in-vitro antifungal sensitivity testing was done by broth microdilution method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute M38-A guidelines. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study with a male:female ratio of 1.38:1. The most commonly affected age group was 31–40 years. Tinea corporis with tinea cruris was the most common type of clinical presentation. Potassium hydroxide mount was positive in 53 samples and culture was positive in 59 samples. Trichophyton rubrum was the predominant species isolated, followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes. On in-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing, itraconazole and amphotericin B had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), followed by terbinafine. Fluconazole had the highest MIC among the drugs tested. Conclusion: Topical corticosteroid abuse, lack of personal hygiene, and habit of sharing clothes were seen in many patients with recalcitrant dermatophytosis. T. rubrum was the most common isolated species. Antifungal susceptibility testing revealed itraconazole and amphotericin B to have the lowest MIC value and fluconazole to have the highest MIC value.","PeriodicalId":34880,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Dermatology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Dermatology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cdr.cdr_58_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent dermatophytosis is a pressing problem worldwide due to inadequate treatment, drug resistance, and indiscriminate use of topical steroids. This scenario increases the need for the study of risk factors and antifungal susceptibility testing. There is a paucity of information on this subject. Objective: We aimed to find the clinico-mycological pattern of recurrent dermatophytic infections, the factors responsible for recurrence and determine the sensitivity pattern of isolates against four antifungals (fluconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and amphotericin B). Materials and Methods: Patients with recurrent dermatophytosis attending the outpatient Department of Our Tertiary Care Institute were enrolled in this study. A detailed history was taken; clinical examination was done; samples were collected for mycological examinations, and in-vitro antifungal sensitivity testing was done by broth microdilution method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute M38-A guidelines. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study with a male:female ratio of 1.38:1. The most commonly affected age group was 31–40 years. Tinea corporis with tinea cruris was the most common type of clinical presentation. Potassium hydroxide mount was positive in 53 samples and culture was positive in 59 samples. Trichophyton rubrum was the predominant species isolated, followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes. On in-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing, itraconazole and amphotericin B had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), followed by terbinafine. Fluconazole had the highest MIC among the drugs tested. Conclusion: Topical corticosteroid abuse, lack of personal hygiene, and habit of sharing clothes were seen in many patients with recalcitrant dermatophytosis. T. rubrum was the most common isolated species. Antifungal susceptibility testing revealed itraconazole and amphotericin B to have the lowest MIC value and fluconazole to have the highest MIC value.
奥里萨邦南部三级保健中心复发性皮肤癣药敏的临床-真菌学分析
背景:由于治疗不充分、耐药和滥用局部类固醇,复发性皮肤癣是世界范围内一个紧迫的问题。这种情况增加了研究危险因素和抗真菌药敏试验的需要。关于这个问题的资料很少。目的:探讨复发性皮肤真菌感染的临床-真菌学特征及引起复发的因素,确定分离物对氟康唑、伊曲康唑、特比萘芬、两性霉素B等4种抗真菌药物的敏感性。材料与方法:选取我院三级保健所门诊的复发性皮肤真菌患者。记录了详细的历史;完成临床检查;采集样品进行真菌学检查,并按照临床和实验室标准协会M38-A指南,用肉汤微量稀释法进行体外抗真菌敏感性试验。结果:共纳入128例患者,男女比例为1.38:1。最常见的发病年龄为31-40岁。体癣合并股癣是最常见的临床表现。53份样品氢氧化钾mount阳性,59份样品培养阳性。分离到的优势种为红毛癣菌,其次为毛癣菌。体外抗真菌药敏试验中,伊曲康唑和两性霉素B的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)最低,特比萘芬次之。氟康唑的MIC最高。结论:顽固性皮癣患者滥用皮质类固醇、缺乏个人卫生和共用衣服的习惯较多。红绒毡虫是最常见的分离种。抗真菌药敏试验显示,伊曲康唑和两性霉素B的MIC值最低,氟康唑的MIC值最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信