A Pilot Study: Is Snoring During Pediatric Dental Procedures Indicative of Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

Harmeet K. Chiang, R. Robinson, A. Best, T. Brickhouse, D. Leszczyszyn
{"title":"A Pilot Study: Is Snoring During Pediatric Dental Procedures Indicative of Obstructive Sleep Apnea?","authors":"Harmeet K. Chiang, R. Robinson, A. Best, T. Brickhouse, D. Leszczyszyn","doi":"10.15331/JDSM.7068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objectives: To determine whether pediatric snoring during sedation could be used to screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by pediatric dentists. Methods: Pediatric dental patients requiring moderate sedation with American Society of Anesthesiologists (I or II) or Brodsky classification (grade 1 and 2) were identified, recruited, separated in groups of snorers and nonsnorers, and then matched based on body mass index to within ±5%. Parents completed a Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ). OSA was diagnosed using a home sleep monitoring device. Groups were compared using a t-test. Results: Overall, 19 children were screened for eligibility and 17 enrolled: 10 who snored (59%) and 7 control participants. Although children who snored during sedation had a nominally higher respiratory disturbance index (RDI) (mean = 5.3 vs. 4.3), this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.7). Using a cutoff RDI > 5 to indicate significant OSA, 5 of 8 in the snorer group and 2 of 4 in the nonsnorer group met this criterion. Conversely, one nonsnoring participant had a maximum relative loudness of 27dB, which resulted in a nominally higher group mean than the snoring group. The questionnaire results of both the PSC and PSQ average was 5 points higher in the snoring group but the difference was not statistically significant (PSQ p = 0.056, PSC p > 0.4). Conclusions: Snoring alone during pediatric dental procedures does not appear to be indicative of obstructive sleep apnea. Recognition of pediatric sleep apnea may be enhanced through questionnaires and adding snore analysis to home-based sleep apnea screening.","PeriodicalId":91534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental sleep medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15331/JDSM.7068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objectives: To determine whether pediatric snoring during sedation could be used to screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by pediatric dentists. Methods: Pediatric dental patients requiring moderate sedation with American Society of Anesthesiologists (I or II) or Brodsky classification (grade 1 and 2) were identified, recruited, separated in groups of snorers and nonsnorers, and then matched based on body mass index to within ±5%. Parents completed a Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ). OSA was diagnosed using a home sleep monitoring device. Groups were compared using a t-test. Results: Overall, 19 children were screened for eligibility and 17 enrolled: 10 who snored (59%) and 7 control participants. Although children who snored during sedation had a nominally higher respiratory disturbance index (RDI) (mean = 5.3 vs. 4.3), this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.7). Using a cutoff RDI > 5 to indicate significant OSA, 5 of 8 in the snorer group and 2 of 4 in the nonsnorer group met this criterion. Conversely, one nonsnoring participant had a maximum relative loudness of 27dB, which resulted in a nominally higher group mean than the snoring group. The questionnaire results of both the PSC and PSQ average was 5 points higher in the snoring group but the difference was not statistically significant (PSQ p = 0.056, PSC p > 0.4). Conclusions: Snoring alone during pediatric dental procedures does not appear to be indicative of obstructive sleep apnea. Recognition of pediatric sleep apnea may be enhanced through questionnaires and adding snore analysis to home-based sleep apnea screening.
一项初步研究:儿童牙科手术时打鼾是否预示阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停?
研究目的:确定儿科牙医是否可以使用镇静期间的儿童打鼾来筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。方法:对美国麻醉师学会(I或II)或Brodsky分类(1级和2级)要求中度镇静的儿童牙科患者进行识别、招募,将其分为打鼾者和非打鼾者两组,然后根据体重指数匹配到±5%以内。家长填写了儿童症状检查表(PSC)和儿童睡眠问卷(PSQ)。OSA是使用家庭睡眠监测设备诊断的。使用t检验对各组进行比较。结果:总体而言,19名儿童被筛选为合格儿童,17名入选儿童:10名打鼾儿童(59%)和7名对照组参与者。尽管在镇静期间打鼾的儿童名义上有更高的呼吸障碍指数(RDI)(平均值=5.3vs.4.3),但这一差异在统计学上并不显著(p>0.05)。使用临界RDI>5表示显著OSA,打鼾组8人中有5人和非打鼾组4人中有2人符合这一标准。相反,一名不打鼾的参与者的最大相对响度为27dB,这导致名义上的组平均值高于打鼾组。打鼾组的PSC和PSQ平均问卷结果均高出5分,但差异无统计学意义(PSQ p=0.056,PSC p>0.4)。结论:儿童牙科手术期间单独打鼾似乎并不预示着阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。通过问卷调查和在家庭睡眠呼吸暂停筛查中添加打鼾分析,可以增强对儿童睡眠呼吸暂停的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信