Much Ado about Something: Re-thinking the Right to Development

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
N. Udombana
{"title":"Much Ado about Something: Re-thinking the Right to Development","authors":"N. Udombana","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a903335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article revisits the right to development (R2D) paradigm. It conceptualizes development using a rights-based model, noting the failure of the conventional paradigm that focuses one-sidedly on economic growth. It interrogates the dialectics on the existence of a R2D, with its correlative duty-bearers, under particular international law, with rigorous analysis of some global instruments. The article also interrogates the related concept of international cooperation under the UN Charter and other primary legal instruments. It notes the modest strides in the long advocacy for the recognition of a R2D but suggests a shift in the current paradigm in recognition of the multidimensional realities in the international landscape.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"431 - 486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a903335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article revisits the right to development (R2D) paradigm. It conceptualizes development using a rights-based model, noting the failure of the conventional paradigm that focuses one-sidedly on economic growth. It interrogates the dialectics on the existence of a R2D, with its correlative duty-bearers, under particular international law, with rigorous analysis of some global instruments. The article also interrogates the related concept of international cooperation under the UN Charter and other primary legal instruments. It notes the modest strides in the long advocacy for the recognition of a R2D but suggests a shift in the current paradigm in recognition of the multidimensional realities in the international landscape.
小题大做:重新思考发展权
摘要:本文回顾了发展权(R2D)范式。它使用基于权利的模式对发展进行概念化,指出了片面关注经济增长的传统范式的失败。它通过对一些全球文书的严格分析,对R2D的存在及其相关责任承受者的辩证法进行了质疑。文章还对《联合国宪章》和其他主要法律文书下国际合作的相关概念进行了探讨。它注意到在长期倡导承认R2D方面取得的缓慢进展,但建议改变目前的模式,以认识到国际格局中的多维现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信